User talk:OliviaWolfie/archives/ModActivities

= August 2019 =

Richard Braine's name
Hi OliviaZoe0

I've noticed that you removed my edit to UKIP leader Richard Braine's article in which I added his full name, Richard William Maguire Braine, with your reason being that the name could be incorrect as you couldn't find any references to it online.

The page seems to have been locked to new editors, so I've provided some online references to Braine's full name below:

https://www.rbkc.gov.uk/pressrelease/pressreleasePage.aspx?id=6985

https://www.rbkc.gov.uk/sites/default/files/atoms/files/Notice%20of%20Election%20Agents%27%20Names%20and%20Offices%20%E2%80%93%20Chelsea%20Riverside%20Ward_0.pdf

https://www.enfieldindependent.co.uk/news/17659369.voters-head-to-the-polls-on-european-parliament-election-day/

https://www.westminster.gov.uk/sites/default/files/eu_parl_list_of_persons_and_parties_nominated_and_notice_of_poll.pdf

http://www.checkcompany.co.uk/director/2551306/MR-RICHARD-WILLIAM-MAGUIRE-BRAINE

Thanks! PlatinumClipper96 (talk) 01:17, 11 August 2019 (UTC)


 * User:PlatinumClipper96 I've restored the full name, with the Westminster Council link as the source (as it ties in with the statement in the article that Mr Braine was second on the UKIP party list in that election). Note that you can yourself request edits to protected pages by adding to the article's talk page, along with the wording of the proposed change. If it's properly sourced, all the better! Cheers. --kingboyk (talk) 09:52, 11 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Looks like it's already been handled, so I guess this reply is kinda useless. But your edit ended up being included in a stream of vandalism, so when I couldn't verify it, I ended up reverting that specific change after another mismatch on the school (according to the website anyway). Now that I've mentioned vandalism, I'm not saying your edits were vandalism - it was just bad timing I guess. Without being able to verify it, I just decided it would be easiest to undo that. The website didn't include the middle names either. I don't live in the UK, so I honestly had no idea where to look specifically. Thanks for the links though, and sorry for the rollback. -- OliviaZoe0 ❤️  (She/her) (talk ) 10:25, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks kingboyk and OliviaZoe0! PlatinumClipper96 (talk) 00:20, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

= October 2020 =

Please use an edit summary
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! I noticed that on your revert for CHERUB you reverted an edit. As this edit wasn’t clear cut vandalism, I suggest using an edit summary to explain why you reverted it. Thanks! — Yours, Berrely  • Talk∕Contribs 21:43, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
 * It's the default message generated by Twinkle when clicking the shiny red "vandalism" button. Not much I can do to change it. That being said, I fail to see how you classify an edit deleting actual content and inserting "pus" after a bunch of newlines in a (previously) sensible block of text as constructive. -- OliviaZoe0 ❤️  (She/her) (talk ) 22:00, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I didn't consider that edit constructive, but generally, unless an edit is extremely obvious vandalism, it would be better to use a more specific edit summary, such as "unexplained content removal". The added content was a table and could've been in good faith, so it is better to say why the edit was reverted. — Yours, Berrely  • Talk∕Contribs 09:45, 23 October 2020 (UTC)