User talk:Oliviaripps

Hello Oliviaripps, please note Weblinks -no links in the flowtext. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:58, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello Serols I challenge your statement "because it did not appear constructive." because I corrected bad grammar and added reliable source links as stated in your own material as ok at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:External_links/Perennial_websites#LinkedIn what I changed and added was fact not opinion stated as fact and provided more evidence to clear up citation request. I followed the standards. I don't need a place to play as you suggested I know exactly what I am doing. Please do not discriminate because I am a female.

Hello Oliviaripps, you have reset my edit, this was not correctly, but you are a new user, so I delete the warning. Please note the rules of Wikipedia. And what do you mean with: Please do not discriminate because I am a female? Regards --Serols (talk) 15:16, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello Serols I made changes following the rules of wikipedia that I quoted in my last message to you. If what changes I made were wrong then why is it stated in wikipedia as correct? Moreover, I didn't make a change that disrupted the flow or the arrangement of the article itself thus I don't need a sandbox to learn how to correctly make changes. If wikipedia is special for only a few users then make that so, but don't single out one person. There was bad grammar in the article prior to my edits. Furthermore, a warning stating that the intro to the article about Jeff was not cited thus I used linkedin as a source to site as stated appropriate in the wikipedia documentation. I also removed an advertisement for another authors book in the article where opinions were stated as a fact. No hard feelings just pointing out and responding to your reply. Thanks for all your help.