User talk:Olivier LPB

Welcome!
Hello, Olivier LPB, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as 2013 in Vatican City, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dark Sun (talk) 21:44, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of 2013 in Vatican City


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that 2013 in Vatican City, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do, and take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
 * It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Dark Sun (talk) 21:44, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The page 2013 in Vatican City was a mistake, you can delete it. Olivier LPB (talk) 21:45, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of participants at the Third Extraordinary General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tadeusz Kondrusiewicz. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Border between Andorra and Spain
Hello, Olivier LPB. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Border between Andorra and Spain, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. RobertsBiology (talk) 17:47, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * End of the proposition of deletion Olivier LPB (talk) 19:41, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

October 2016
Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Anchorage has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Elizium23 (talk) 04:32, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry but you are wrong. I have given the source of the nomination, the installation is dissociated of the nomination. During the mass of installation, the bull is dated from the date of nomination.  So I want your apologizes about your accusation of "speculative or unconfirmed information". Olivier LPB (talk) 12:18, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Legally the bishop does not hold his office until his installation. Would you put "Donald Trump" in the "President of the United States" infobox as "Incumbent" on November 9, 2016? The President does not hold office, or any power that comes with it, until inauguration. It is canonically similar with bishops. It is especially noticeable with priests who are elected as new bishops, because they are utterly incapable of exercising ordinary power without episcopal consecration, which is something that happens at installation. Elizium23 (talk) 22:22, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
 * For more information, please see the previous discussions:


 * Talk:Charles J. Chaput
 * Talk:Samuel J. Aquila
 * Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Catholicism/Archive_2012
 * Talk:Salvatore J. Cordileone
 * Talk:Mario Poli
 * I have opened an RFC on the question of appointment of Catholic bishops and the larger matter of inclusion of future jobs in infobox, list, etc. at MOS:BIO. Please see Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biographies/2014_archive
 * Elizium23 (talk) 23:17, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

San Juan COA
If you can, convert the "new" Coat of Arms into .svg and not revert back to the "old" COA .svg file. Also, there are 5 other COA's in that archdiocese that need to be converted from .jpg to .svg files. Thanks... Roberto221 (talk) 17:03, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The older is better than the newer. You can't impose your version of coat of arms, specially when they aren't verified. Olivier LPB (talk) 17:09, 14 October 2016 (UTC)