User talk:Ololort

= Constructive criticism =

Don't just
Don't just remove stuff from other peoples userpages and not leave a note on the talk page explaining it. Next time message the user on the talk page as well. Also, do you have another account or are you just 'contributing' to Wikipedia by removing joke messages.--Everyone Dies In the End (talk) 11:40, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Excuse me?
Nothing of that sort is prohibited, so please restrain yourself from editing people's user pages. Thank you. Smarojit (talk) 05:17, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Stay off my page
Stay off my page or else you'll be reported. You do you think you are? Everyone else seems okay with it.--Lbrun12415 01:26, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

New message
It seems that you've removed the message from other people's pages. I understand that there is now a new rule about it, but I would have appreciated it if you left a message on my talk page. There has been several times when people have edited my user page without my permission, including one where someone removed that same banner. I immediately assumed you had done then same. It would probably be best if you left a message on everyone's talk page. I understand that this would take a while to do, but you will just irritate people if you do things like this, even if it's one of the wikipedia rules. Thank you for your time (assuming you will read this and are not a bot)--Stikman (talk) 12:48, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Misleading talk page
Unfortunately, you have moved JamesBWatson's comment and seem to inadvertently included mine in the 'unconstructive' message group. I am assuming this was a mistake, because otherwise you would be deliberately trying to mislead people. I'd like to point out that my message is constructive, as I am trying to help you to prevent... misunderstandings between yourself and others. This message (the one I am posting now) is also to help prevent misunderstandings and allow people to know that I was not being unconstructive and that JamesBWatson did not originally intend to include me or any subsequent people in this. Thank you for your time --Stikman (talk) 15:35, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

=Complaints about this talk page= I understand now that you did intend to mislead people by rearranging the comments in order to change the meaning. I thought this was somewhat strange, because you seemed to want to uphold wikipedia policy. Although I can't exactly find a policy about this, there is a mention on the "Talk page guideline" page about not changing the meaning of other people's comments. I would say that reordering the page in this way somewhat changes the meaning of what JamesBWatson wrote. Of course, should they ever come back here, they may want to amend their comment to include mine and every subsequent comment, but it's somewhat unfair to assume that they want to without any evidence. Anyway, I'm not that bothered how you organise your talk page, I just thought you may have took my 'criticism' positively, as I was not intending to cause offence, just suggesting a way that you could avoid abuse. I'll try to refrain from commenting here again.This comment was posted after JamesBWatson's comment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stikman (talk • contribs)

Still misleading
You have had several years to reorganise this page, and have failed to do so. It is highly disappointing and upsetting that you have not done this. I have experienced a great deal of stress and anxiety over the past few years because the organisation on this page is somewhat misleading. This means that a great number of visitors reading this page may think my comments are a complaint. It may seem petty, but the overwhelming stress of this has caused my hair to become prematurely grey and bald. I also now cannot use a PC without crying and howling in agony (tablets and phones are fine). I hope you are satisfied with what you have done.

Yours sincerely,

--Stikman (talk) 09:46, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Still Misleading
You've had several years to reorganise this page, and several more since the last time I visited, and yet you have failed to do so. The stress caused to myself because this page is slightly misleading is immense. I have suffered so much, that I have become almost fully paralysed. I can only move only a single nostril hair, and have to have a complex machine attached to my head to translate it's movements into speech. I then have to use a speech-to-text program in order to communicate online. It has taken me four months to type out this message, so I hope you are satisfied with what you have done.--Stikman (talk) 15:09, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

= Other =

Good work
You have set yourself a very unusual task, and I am surprised at how persistent you are at it. However, it is good work. Don't let messages unconstructive like the ones above put you off. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:35, 21 July 2012 (UTC)