User talk:OlympusNDT

July 2014
Hello, I'm Piguy101. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Olympus Corporation without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Piguy101 (talk) 19:40, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Article Blanking
Hello. I see that you're blanked the page InXitu with the edit summary that the company no longer exists. However, please be noted that Notability is not temporary and that, given that the article subject was notable, the page cannot be blanked now that the company does not exist. You could rewrite the article and go through the deletion procedure, but please read Wikipedia's policy on conflict of interest, WP:COI, before making further edits related to the company Olympus. If you have any questions or comments, please leave a message on my talk page.  KJ  Discuss? 10:18, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Could you please tell me what is the deletion procedure? Thank you. OlympusNDT (talk) 12:22, 6 August 2014 (UTC)


 * You may want to take a look at WP:Deletion policy. However, the mere fact that something no longer exists does not mean Wikipedia should not have an article about the subject, as the articles about, say, PanAm or the East India Company will attest. Huon (talk) 12:45, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:OlympusNDT, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages; user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you can indicate why the page is not blatant advertising, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy deletion candidate). Doing so will take you to your user talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also edit this page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would help make it encyclopedic. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Amortias (T)(C) 19:53, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because it provides factual and up-to-date information about a publicly held international company. The submission includes references, historical information, product directory and a variety of links that prove the information is neutral and accurate. The page does not differ from the fellow, existing, directory and reference pages of international organizations.--209.6.4.58 (talk) 20:05, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

It is very unilateral to choose to block a user when you fully don't explain the reasons other than citing a resource or rule, which I have read and truly don't believe was broken. It seems there is more than regulatory opposition to publishing this specific company's page here. Thanks anyway.

OlympusNDT (talk) 12:58, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. Thank you. § FreeRangeFrog croak 22:20, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

It is very unilateral to suggest a rule has broken when I have read what was provided and truly do not think such rule was broken after all. There seems to be more than regulatory opposition to publishing this company page. Thanks anyway. OlympusNDT (talk) 13:05, 12 August 2014 (UTC)


 * You seem to have missed the distinction between encyclopedia articles and user accounts. See WP:CORPNAME. Huon (talk) 14:52, 12 August 2014 (UTC)