User talk:Om wadaw

Welcome!
Hello, Om wadaw, and welcome to Wikipedia!&#32;Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Kebab Turki Baba Rafi, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article.&#32;Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! IamNotU (talk) 13:48, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019
Hello, I'm IamNotU. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kebab Turki Baba Rafi, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. IamNotU (talk) 13:48, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Kebab Turki Baba Rafi. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. IamNotU (talk) 13:51, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Kebab Turki Baba Rafi; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. IamNotU (talk) 16:47, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kebab Turki Baba Rafi, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. IamNotU (talk) 16:50, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kebab Turki Baba Rafi, you may be blocked from editing. Samf4u (talk) 12:36, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kebab Turki Baba Rafi. Samf4u (talk) 12:39, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. 5 albert square (talk) 15:01, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Why i block
I was blocked from editing article, which is i edit according to the fact Om wadaw (talk) 15:03, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
 * For edits like this. That is not a website and if you try to click on the link it will tell you that your connection is not private and someone is trying to get your information etc etc.  If you don't agree with your block, follow the instructions above.-- 5 albert square (talk) 15:08, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Just an observation that I don't think the charge of "vandalism" is correct here, since that's malicious and deliberate damage or defacement. What's going on is that there's a dispute between the two former partners about ownership and control of the company. , if you're getting messages that "your connection is not private" etc., you may have a problem with your browser configuration. The link given to babarafi.id was http, not https. You would only see that message if your browser is automatically redirecting you to the misconfigured https address, maybe due to a web extension you've installed.

Having said that, I fully support a block, since their contributions appear to be undisclosed paid editing. They've also shown that they're not able to understand or follow core Wikipedia policies about citing reliable sources, neutral point of view, edit warring, and conflict of interest. All signs point to a single-purpose account who is using Wikipedia as a soapbox to advance their personal and business interests, not here to build an encyclopedia. --IamNotU (talk) 17:10, 27 January 2019 (UTC)