User talk:OmarAbuAli

Make Someone Happy
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Make Someone Happy, and it appears to include a substantial copy of. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:57, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Make Someone Happy
A tag has been placed on Make Someone Happy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - He  ck  XX  ( G, W , U , V ) 21:02, 19 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi. It doesn't matter if the lyrics can be found in a million places, they're still under copyright, and shouldn't be included in Wikipedia articles. The rest of the article was a word for word copy from a paragraph at . While it's true that information can't be copyrighted, the presentation of that information can be, and is, unless noted otherwise. If you believe the song in question meets the relevant notability criteria, please write about it in your own words, and don't copy stuff from somewhere else. Thanks. - Bobet (talk) 21:47, 19 November 2007 (UTC)


 * I will just chime in here and concur. Easily found does not mean legal to put in Wikipedia, I'm afraid.  &mdash; Coren (talk) 22:39, 19 November 2007 (UTC)