User talk:Omar Sharieff

Welcome!
Hello, Omar Sharieff, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Ekkadiki Pothavu Chinnavada does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Cotton2 (talk) 07:13, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 08:07, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Genre bloat
Hi there, re: this, please don't add bloated genres like "supernatural romantic comedy thriller". Per community consensus, you should use one main genre, and one sub-genre if a sub-genre is warranted, it should be sourced, and it should represent what most reliable sources call it. Genre is subjective, and we're not here to promote editors' personal evaluations. If most sources call it a comedy, then go with that. If most sources call it a romantic comedy, or a thriller, then go with one of those. Using four descriptors is unjustifiable and it only makes the introductory sentence very hard to navigate. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:20, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ekkadiki Pothavu Chinnavada, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diff:  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:20, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF). About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Unsourced genre
Hi there, re: this, please don't submit unsourced genres. Genres are subjective and it's rather problematic when everybody has their own opinion about how a film should be classified. Per MOS:FILM: "The lead section should ... identify the following elements: the title of the film, the year of its public release, and the primary genre or sub-genre under which it is verifiably classified." And typically, we only care about what most sources would describe a film as--we don't pick and choose bits from one site and then tack them onto bits from another site. Also, I've never heard of a "romantic comedy-drama" as a genre. I've heard of romance films. I've heard of romantic comedies. I've heard of comedy-dramas. "Romantic comedy-drama" sounds like a mash-up of several different genre. Anyhow, I'm deleting the genre until you can adequately source it. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:35, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced genre. What sources are calling American Made a "biographical crime comedy"? What sources are calling Sivaji a "vigilante masala film"? What sources call Duvvada Jagannadham a "vigilante action comedy"? If the answer is "no sources", then you should not be making these changes. As noted above, we care what most sources describe the film as, not what you personally describe the film as and we should be sticking to established genres. "Biographical crime comedy" is not an established genre. "Vigilante masala" is not an established genre. Even if you can source some aspect of the addition, the entire descrption needs to be sourced. So simply finding a site that describes Sivaji as a vigilante film, and finding a site that describes Sivaji as a masala film, then cobbling them together into "vigilante masala" is not sufficient, as this represents synthesis. Our references must describe the film wholly as a "vigilante masala" to be included. Note that genre warring will not be tolerated. Any more unsourced genres will result in an interruption of your editing privileges. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:58, 31 July 2017 (UTC)