User talk:Omdo/Archive2012-I

About your edit to Sarawak Report
Please refrain from adding redundant materials into this page. And do not modify any quotes to include the word "Sabah" just because Sarawak Report had published a series of leaked documents on Musa Aman. The "About us" page still focus on Sarawak and not Sabah unless Sarawak Report make its intention clear that it focuses the corruption issues on both the Malaysian states in Borneo. Do not make a list about various sections inside the Sarawak Report. Readers can always browse these sections inside Sarawak Report website itself! Remember Wikipedia is not a directory. Instead, you can follow the format as shown on WikiLeaks wikipage to edit the Sarawak Report article. There are so many issues that you can write about Sarawak Report, such as Ta Ann's timber certification controversy and its involvement in Tasmania logging, an overview of Taib's land grabs, scandals of deputy chief ministers, reception of Sarawak Report by readers (as reported by Sarawak Report or any other reliable third party sources), Malaysian government's pressure against it and many more. Don't be disheartened by this revert. You are most welcome to contribute for Wikipedia! Regards. Cerevisae (talk) 14:35, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1654 (XVI)
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1654 (XVI), and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://wpik.org/Src/un1654.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 16:07, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

UN treaties
He Omdo, Just saw your additions of UN treaties (addn of all pages to commons and image of the first page on wikipedia pages). I am a bit confused about the status of those documents. As they have no seals and signatures, they seem not the be the original ones. What is then the relevance in showing the first page on wikipedia? Looking forward to your ideas! L.tak (talk) 10:45, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Looking at more of your edits btw: why not contribute them to wikisource and get that project more conprehensive? I am willing to help in proofreading etc; but am not capable of any uploading of original files etc... L.tak (talk) 10:49, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Copyvio?
Hello,

I was recently viewing your edits at Hansard of the Malaysia Bill, and noticed that some of the content you added may have been a copy of Culture, Power and Resistance: Post-Colonialism, Autobiography and Malaysian Independence. If it is, please remove it immediately. Thanks, Athleek  123  02:52, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1514 (XV) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Colonial and Manifestations


 * United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1654 (XVI) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Colonial and Freedom


 * Independence of Singapore Agreement 1965 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Independent

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:53, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19
Hi. When you recently edited Sabah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malay (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:27, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Your work on Sabah 20 points & Malaysia agreement
I really appreciate your effort on improving these articles: 20-point_agreement and Malaysia Agreement. You are extremely knowledgeable in this subject. However, regarding your recent edits to the article Sarawak, your edits seems to be redundant because the article Sarawak aims to provide a general, brief overview of all the aspects regarding Sarawak. More specific details such as Malaysia agreement should not be elaborated here. It should be discussed under a specific wikipage. However, you can create some links to your intended wiki articles if you want.

I would recommend you to create an article regarding Sarawak's 18 points agreement, accompanied with differences with Sabah 20 points agreement, and also issues regarding these agreements such as Sarawak and Sabah 5% oil royalty, "negara" or "negeri" status of Sabah and Sarawak, state religion, state language (English or Malay), and pace of development in these two Borneo states as compared to Peninsula which is often raised by the Pakatan Rakyat and Jeffrey Kitingan. How the federal government violated these agreements are also one of their concerns.

Some people even argue that Malayasia Agreement is now null and void because the federal government did not consult Sabah and Sarawak which shall be "equal partners" when Malaysia decided to kick out Singapore in 1965. If this is the case, Sarawak and Sabah shall be independent. But it is odd that nobody has bring this case to court. Do note that the controversial Project IC has also been discussed extensively on Wikipedia.

I think that the above issues will help the readers to give a second thought about these agreements and also their importance. These issues will give the deeper insights regarding the essence of these agreements. Nobody will read such long, boring agreements unless somebody is willing to interpret the terms and their impact on the society. The choice is yours. Anyways, wish you happy editing!Cerevisae (talk) 01:25, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sabah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page State (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kuching Declaration, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page States (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

ANI
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Mephistophelian (talk) 16:42, 23 September 2012 (UTC).

September 2012
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Sabah. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:36, 24 September 2012 (UTC)


 * You have been blocked for 48 hours for edit-warring. Your first edit after the expiration of your block was to resume your edit war at Sabah by partially reverting another editor. You must take part in consensus projects. When your block expires, I would strongly encourage you to discuss the changes you would like to make to this article at its talk page. If you do not, but continue making changes without discussion, you will be blocked again. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:25, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hansard of the Malaysia Bill


The article Hansard of the Malaysia Bill has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Appears to be a made up name of what is just a search report from Hansard, these documents are freely available and we dont need links to poor copies when a search of the real Hansard archive would be far better.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MilborneOne (talk) 16:31, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Malaysia Act, 1963 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Executive Council and Supreme Council


 * Proclamation of Singapore (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Independent

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Malaysian speeches and documents
Instead of placing links to very specific speeches in places where it is definitely undue to mention, why not create a template of speeches/documents important to the history of Malaysia? That might be viable, and could be placed on all of those articles. CMD (talk) 20:02, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:States of the federation of Malaysia
Template:States of the federation of Malaysia has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. CMD (talk) 16:49, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Category:Sabah–Malaysia relations
Category:Sabah–Malaysia relations, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. CMD (talk) 16:51, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * sorry no time 180.253.244.168 (talk) 18:48, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Omdo, you have no time to participate in a discussion or replying to other Wikipedians but you have time to edit Sarawak and Sabah articles which will be deleted eventually. You are knowledgeable in this subject and we wish that you can make some useful contributions to Wikipedia. Could you justify that why you like to add raw agreements and proclaimations to these articles? Of course we cannot force you to reply to our questions and I respect your decision. Regards Cerevisae (talk) 11:09, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Category:Bilateral relations of Malaya
Category:Bilateral relations of Malaya, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. CMD (talk) 16:21, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Malaysian states
The Malaysian states are not sovereign. Kindly please inserting links suggesting they are. I note that, despite being blocked for uncommunicative edit warring, you have still not posted a single point of discussion on any talkpage. This behaviour is likely to get you blocked again, despite some valuable contributions you have made regarding Malaysia's legal history. CMD (talk) 10:23, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Malaysia Defence Industry Council, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defence (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

October 2012 Jakarta meetup invitation
Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup on Wednesday the 24th of October. Details and an attendee list are at Indonesian Wikipedia page id:Wikipedia:Kopi darat/Jakarta (24 Oktober 2012). Hope you can make it either in the afternoon or evening. John Vandenberg 13:32, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Jakarta)

Disambiguation link notification for October 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Malaysia Act, 1963, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Executive Council (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:22, 24 October 2012 (UTC)