User talk:Omegatron/Archive/December, 2007

Wikipedia:Footnotes
Please see Protection policy:
 * During edit wars, administrators should not protect pages when they are involved as a party to the dispute, except in the case of simple vandalism or libel issues against living people.

Like me Omegatron you are clearly not a disinterested party to the reference tag dispute that has been going on for a long time on the Footnotes guideline page(   etc) So given that this action was clearly against the above statement in the Protection policy,  I am asking a an administator who has not participated in this dispute either to remove the protection or to revert you last edit and reinstate the protection. --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 11:36, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Link: Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents — Omegatron 17:53, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Kazvorpal's comments on truth vs. silence
Just discovered your approval of the comments at User:Kazvorpal. Thought you might want to second me in suggesting they be promoted to essay length, or to facilitate the process. Since I noticed you also edited V for Vendetta, you might also be interested in a discussion relating to both it and Kaz's comments, currently ongoing at WP:COIN. Thank you for your adminship. John J. Bulten 18:19, 30 November 2007 (UTC)


 * My approval of what? — Omegatron 23:54, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Avoid personal remarks
You said
 * don't insert your personal bias into articles

Pot calling kettle black is not nice. If you keep making personal remarks I will report you. --Uncle Ed (talk) 04:37, 21 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for trying to make the article better, but Wikipedia articles must be edited from a neutral point of view.
 * You removed text from an article with the following justification: "I've been in the computer industry for over 25 years, and I've never used the term or read it in an engineering journal or textbook".
 * Please don't remove things from articles simply because you are personally unfamiliar with them. This results in systemic bias.  — Omegatron 19:12, 21 December 2007 (UTC)