User talk:Omer rahsan

Welcome!
Hello, Omer rahsan, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:39, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

"Article Evaluation"
Name of article: Argument Technology, Argument technology

-Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. -- I believe it`s topic really important topic this is why I chose this article

Lead Guiding questions

-Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? --Yes, introductory sentence clearly describes what is argument technology -Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? --Yes it does. ``Argument technology has applications in a variety of domains, including education, healthcare, policy making, and risk management and has a variety of sub-fields, methodologies and technologies.`` -Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? --The article is more about future. Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? --it is concise.

Lead evaluation Content Guiding questions

-Is the article's content relevant to the topic? -- yes it is -Is the content up-to-date? -- it is up to number -Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? -- No there is not. -Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? --The article does not deal with any of Wikipedia`s gaps. The topics are related to historically.

Content evaluation Tone and Balance Guiding questions

-Is the article neutral? -- no it is not. --Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? -- Yes there is two different claims. Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? --overpresented Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? --in favor of one position

Tone and balance evaluation Sources and References Guiding questions

Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? -- all facts in the article backed up by reliable secondary source. Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? yes it is Are the sources current? yes it is Check a few links. Do they work? yes they are working.

Sources and references evaluation Organization Guiding questions

Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? the article clear and easy to read Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? none Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? well-organized

Organization evaluation Images and Media Guiding questions

Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? no it does not have images Are images well-captioned? --- Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? --- Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? --- Images and media evaluation Checking the talk page Guiding questions

What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? --The conversations are helping to understand the article better. How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? C class and it is part of WikiProjects.

Talk page evaluation Overall impressions Guiding questions

What is the article's overall status? medium developed What are the article's strengths? good organization and detailed information. How can the article be improved? with some relevant images. How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? Article has good organization with specific important information.it is medium developed.

Cooper Justin/Computer and Video Games Review
I am reviewing Cooper Justin's work on an article Computer and Video Games. The article is about how computer and video games are computer, how it can be better, what is important for gamers, what is the future of computer and video games. I believe generally the technology will be everywhere in our life. And Computer and video games will be very important part of technology and modern life. According to my Mygaming website ``There are 1.8 billion gamers in the world, and PC gaming dominates the market``. The number of gamers is really a lot and it proves why computer and video games area is so important. Every 1 of 5 people is a gamer. On the other hand we need to think about why computer and video games are popular and what gamers like. I believe the reason why computer and video games are popular, gamers are able to do the things on computer and video games which they can not do in real life. Second thing I agree with Justin what gamers like, reality is the biggest important thing for gamers. For a game, how it is seem more real, it will be more popular. Computer and video games area is really huge and it`s future is so bright. By every new day gamer`s number is increasing.