User talk:Omg look behind you

Welcome!
Hello, Omg look behind you, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! McSly (talk) 13:16, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Remote viewing description
Hi there, I noticed your edit here describing evidence for Remote viewing as existing but contested. I agree with User:McSly that the original description was better, as it aligns with Wikipedia guidelines on how to best describe the evidence for fringe theories. In particular, see WP:FDESC. Calling the evidence 'scientific but contested' is giving it too much weight, as the evidence is overwhelmingly considered non-credible by the scientific community. StereoFolic (talk) 19:15, 14 January 2024 (UTC)