User talk:Omisblue

Speedy deletion of Mr. Smolin
A tag has been placed on Mr. Smolin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Rwiggum (Talk /Contrib ) 04:34, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

deletion
Hi, I deleted your recent article because it did not provide independent verifiable sources that it meets the notability guidelines. It had previously been deleted by another admin for the same reason. The fact that Stew is notable does not mean your man is. I have doubts about Dr Demento, but at least that had plenty of references, whereas the three you gave did little to establish liability.

The style was also unencyclopaedic moniker and spammy lush, non-linear and Renowned. Basically, a teacher who does a bit of radio.

There is nothing to stop you recreating the article, but it needs better evidence and a more suitable style, jimfbleak (talk) 05:32, 5 August 2008 (UTC)