User talk:Omisson

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Excellent first edits. The entry for Theodism is brand new, and is very much in need of attention and cleaning up. Your edits are helpful, but please keep in mind that this is an encyclopaedic article. Phrases such as strive to cleave, raised on a shield, emerged at the knee and other such flowery speech is out of place and will be quickly removed by third party editors who are not as sympathetic as I. Please edit your recent additions to conform to a more encyclopaedic style. Also, attempt to succinctly explain certain nomenclature used within the subculture when you use it. Please provide as many outside links and verifiable sources for names, organizations, histories, quotations, ISBN's, etc. to circumvent problems down the road. If you don't know how to do footnotes, etc. just post the information on the talk page for the entry and someone will take care of it. Don't worry about getting the formatting right, I am somewhat stewarding this entry until it is a little more dialed in and if I don't get to it, someone else will. Don't forget to log back in and sign your edits using four tildes and to explain what you are doing in the summary box - currently you are not logged in and anonymous edits are often wholesale reverted or removed because of vandalism.

Please read about the thews of Wikipedia:
 * Cite Sources
 * Cite Verifiable Sources
 * Do Not Use Original Research
 * Use Reliable Published Sources
 * Maintain a Neutral Point of View

Welga! -- HroptR 04:49, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

Germanic Neopaganism
I noticed your edits to Germanic Neopaganism, and while the information is generally quite good, it would be better if you would move those paragraphs to the Theodism article, as Germanic Neopaganism is more of a general article about the various incarnations of our faith rather than just one. Thanks!  P . Mac Uidhir  (t)  (c)  01:58, 1 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Now that I have read it a few more times, I retract my comments above. Your contributions actually have made me think it might be time to spawn a daughter article from Germanic Neopaganism- specifically, History of Germanic Neopaganism.
 *  P . Mac Uidhir  (t)  (c) 18:55, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Reply
I replied to your comment over on my talk page - I prefer to keep discussion intact in one place, so I reply where someone comments rather than playing talk page tag. Welga! -- HroptR 22:06, 2 January 2006 (UTC)