User talk:Ommegang17

Welcome!

Hello, Ommegang17, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Chapman&, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Zachlipton (talk) 05:03, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Chapman's Problem


Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Chapman's Problem, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Zachlipton (talk) 05:03, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chapman's Problem


The article Chapman's Problem has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Cannot find any sources that discuss "Chapmen's Problem" (or puzzle). See WP:N for more information on the criteria for Wikipedia articles. To avoid deletion, you need to cite reliable sources that demonstrate the notability of this problem and that validate that this is its name. Thanks.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zachlipton (talk) 05:22, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

The problem is a new one and one which I am currently researching - Chapman is the name of the individual who recently posed it. Hence it may not appear under this name. It may be that it is simply a special case of permutations mathematics and if I discover this I will be sure to add that to the page along with the solution to the problem.
 * Ok that's great, but to have its own Wikipedia article, a topic must meet the notability guidelines. Wikipedia is not a place for original research as we are an encyclopedia and not a journal. If there aren't reliable references to this topic, then I'm afraid it's not ready at this time for an article. Otherwise, please cite such references. Thanks. Zachlipton (talk) 11:10, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for removing the speedy deletion. I'll be sure to include some further sources on the page. I definitely realize that wikipedia isn't a journal, and I wouldn't want this article to appear to be too discursive in voice. I do believe that the entry represents a legitimate and complete entry on an open and as yet unsolved problem.

Thanks for your time!
 * Hi there. The problem is that we can't have an article called "Chapman's Problem" if no one has ever called it that before. Who is Chapman? If there are reliable published sources that describe this as a special case of Catalan's problem, then the topic probably should be addressed in the existing Catalan's problem article with appropriate referencing. I certainly recognize it's a legitimate problem, but the criteria to have a Wikipedia article is more stringent than that: see WP:42 for more details. If the information in the article hasn't been published elsewhere already, then it's original research which we cannot accept. Thank you. Zachlipton (talk) 03:09, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chapman's Problem


The article Chapman's Problem has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Ran a Google check and found no evidence of significance. In addition, I am adding this because it was recently removed by the article's author, when I don't see a reason to remove it.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Angelo  ♫ 02:19, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Chapman's Problem for deletion
The article Chapman's Problem is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Chapman's Problem until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:03, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

June 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bloom syndrome. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kanonkas : Talk  20:01, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Kanonkas : Talk  20:02, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:ZZZZBBBB.JPEG
Thanks for uploading File:ZZZZBBBB.JPEG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 4 June 2015 (UTC)