User talk:OmniNed

Your GDP revision in Wikipedia 25 November 2015
OmniNed I updated the GDP wiki pages some time ago to replace a wrong definition of GDP, replacing it with the OECD / World Bank definition. I wonder why you think your new definition is superior to the OECD? Is there a citation for your new definition? Is it identical to the OECD definition? Why does it not specify 'resident production units (the main meaning of the GDP in GDP which distinguishes it from GNP) I also think the opening paragraphs should be for non-economists and should clearly and quickly address the principal misconception about GDP which is that it is a 'top-line revenue' total (as you say GO is, a useful addition to the article). With an example. Regards, Hugh Small Hugh Small 22:43, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Carlson (January 9)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert Carlson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Robert Carlson, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and save.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Robert_Carlson Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Robert_Carlson reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:45, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of NewEdge Wealth


A tag has been placed on NewEdge Wealth, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Storchy (talk) 20:13, 9 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Storchy,
 * I am fairly new to this and I would like some more-detailed feedback so that I can improve my edits in the future.
 * First of all, I realized only afterwards that I forgot to include the code in the first line to mark the page I did for NewEdge Wealth. LLC as a draft, and that the article was published as it was. I was planning on working on the draft, and I indented to add more information and additional references. Lesson learned.
 * Additionally, please let me know what makes the text I used seem as "unambiguous advertising". I thought that it was relatively factual.
 * Actually, I found another article (Newedge Group) that seems quite similar in form and tone to what I wrote, yet, this page has not been deleted and is available on Wikipedia.
 * If you get chance, please provide some feedback, so that I can do a better job in the future.
 * Also, is there away to access the deleted page that I wrote, so that I can see it for a reference for improving?
 * Thanks a lot. OmniNed (talk) 23:22, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. -- Ponyo bons mots 20:18, 9 November 2022 (UTC)