User talk:Omni Maximum

Welcome!
Hello, Omni Maximum, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Kew OhSo, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:57, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kew OhSo


A tag has been placed on Kew OhSo, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:57, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

 * I've already changed and follow the rules of creating an article and PRAXIDICAE is still trying to speedy delete nominate; can this false claim be fixed? Cause everything is fine! PRAXIDICAE sent this speedy delete, when I'm deleting a small error in the article and I find it uncalled for; especially when I just restarted from yesterday and finished today. Please end the speedy delete nomination; nothing is wrong was done wrong with the article.  Omni Maximum (talk) 23:00, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Nobodies giving me a chance to edit errors...they just keep on speedy delete and removing the article; how can I fix the error, if whoever keeps getting rid of the article, won't let me change anything? Omni Maximum (talk) 18:35, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Liz! I have been hit with Speedy Deletes left and right, article keep being removed and now I'm being told I'm speaking promotional language and my article can't be published... How many excuses and claims are gonna be tossed at me, until I finally can have a article up, with no take downs? I've literally reread everything and there's not any sign of promotional language; it just went up and already, can't be up for public, cause its " promotional language"...this is stressing cause no one wants to highlight, what in the article that's "promotional language"; different people keep coming at me, about intentions I'm not even doing in the article; nobody is even messaging me in the talks about getting rid of certain paragraph or anything through highlighting; all they do is get rid of the article...it starting to become personal driven and unwelcomed vibes; cause people refuse to highlight anything, so I can actually edit the article and change it on the spot. They keep resetting!  Omni Maximum (talk) 01:05, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
 * " This editor ("the largest of all?") seems to be a self-promoter seeking to create an article on
 * Kew OhSo
 * (himself?). That title has been twice deleted as
 * G11
 * and ECP-create-protected, so the editor renamed the title with an unnecessary disambiguation as
 * Kew OhSo (artist)
 * . I nominated it for deletion, and then it was also speedily deleted. So the editor created it again, and this time it has been draftified. The author's comment at the AFD:
 * How can I fix the errors; if they keep removing the article? Every time I try to fix the article, the Wikipedia search for its existence says its not there...so how can I fix those errors, if whoever keeps removing it?
 * is amusing. (Maybe the existence of the article was an error.)
 * A block from article space seems like a reasonable minimum sanction. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:44, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[ reply]
 * Are you serious? What in that response is deserving a block? Now your saying I'm doing an article on myself? When there's specifically a feature that shows "Move"; where you can simply make the article your making a "Article" and putting a title, about who or what your writing. What am doing is this bad that's making you see me, this negative? When all I'm doing is just asking to highlight what is wrong, so I can change it in the article, while the article is up. Wikipedia is meant to edit things and upgrade, stuff that are off or needs updating; I can't even do that cause the article is removed, which means I have start over and correct what is off; how is correcting what I believe is off and publishing it, to see if everything is okay, a bad thing?
 * " You need to work on this to remove the promotional language and find citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 00:15, 6 August 2022 "
 * He didn't claim I needed to be block; all I need to do is remove "promotional language" and I'm fine. Omni Maximum (talk) 01:26, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[ reply]
 * Editor blocked and draft deleted (again).--Bbb23 (talk) 01:34, 6 August 2022 (UTC) "
 * Liz! This is what I'm talking about! I'm trying to prove my innocents and explain what I'm doing to avoid issues and I get attacked with these claims; I'm being treated unfairly! Rsjaffe already told me what I have to do, to make my article public and as soon as I was about to do that, Bbb23 randomly blocked me personally in defense of Robert, who I have no issues with nor Bbb23, who pop out of no where and block me and deleted the draft Rsjaffe said I'm must deal with and submit for review, to make my article public. So basically not only I'm being personally disrespected for no reason, but so is Rsjaffe; because Bbb23 prevented him from helping me out. Also if you check my talk; I've been hit twice yesterday for speedy deletion on purpose by PRAXIDICAE🌈; for an article that's no longer up and the draft from Rsjaffe; in which I never manage to get to, because of Bbb23. Can you please tell Bbb23 and Praxidicae to use their privilege's professionally and not personally or agenda driven? Please! I'll also be requesting an unblock; so please help me out! Thank you very much for the Tea House invite!   Omni Maximum (talk) 05:01, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kew OhSo


A tag has been placed on Kew OhSo, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. PRAXIDICAE🌈 22:47, 4 August 2022 (UTC)


 * I apologize for my wrongs; please forgive me; I have no intentions of wrong doings or throwing shade on anyone, who think I've done wrong; please message any changes that must be done to my article and it will be changed, so it doesn't get a speedy delete; I'm doing my best to understand every rule and follow every guideline. Omni Maximum (talk) 00:17, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Kew OhSo (artist) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kew OhSo (artist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kew OhSo (artist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:51, 5 August 2022 (UTC)


 * I didn't get a chance a chance to fix any errors...the article is gone; please bring back the article so the errors can be fixed. Omni Maximum (talk) 18:27, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kew OhSo (artist)


A tag has been placed on Kew OhSo (artist), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Why? I Ask (talk) 03:58, 5 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Please bring back the article, so the errors can be fixed; I need to know what needs to dealt with; but every minute I try to fix it; someone keeps getting rid of the article; articles get edit and updated everyday on Wikipedia; why can't I edit the article if it have errors? Every time its speedy delete; nobody is giving me chance to edit the article in order to avoid that; all they do is get rid of the article. Omni Maximum (talk) 18:32, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Kew OhSo (artist) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Kew OhSo (artist), is not suitable as written to remain published.

You need to work on this to remove the promotional language and find citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 00:15, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:43, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Kew OhSo


A tag has been placed on Draft:Kew OhSo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. PRAXIDICAE🌈 01:30, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Kew OhSo


A tag has been placed on Draft:Kew OhSo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. PRAXIDICAE🌈 01:31, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 01:34, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

They Removed My Unblock
I post another unblock response and they removed it, with no reason and notification or response...this is going against me on a personal purpose and not professional driven and reasoning; which means what I said in the next Unblock, was truth and they don't respect my truth; may I please work with reasonable admins, who don't have any personal issues against me? Somebody is looking to start conflict with me, by abusing their privileges' as admin and I'm not even a trouble maker; they're literally sockpuppets and trolls on this site, I don't even agree with and are free (and given other wikipedians problems), on this site, but when someone reasonable like me is here and not them, trying to avoid those types and work respectfully...I'm wrong and they start bullying me, for being reasonable and showing proof. Imma post my second Unblock response they personally removed, to show proof of what I'm talking about; so please can a good hearted admin come out and help me, and not the ones who are personally against me. Omni Maximum (talk) 18:04, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I removed your unblock request because it was an unsalvageable mess. You are free to create another one, but look at it with Preview before you Publish it to make sure it is formatted properly and readable. Also, I strongly urge you to make it concise and to the point.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:07, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

My Articles Are Not Promo Or COI
My first article does not represent promo or COI; it only represents what an article is meant to represent and stands with Wikipedia guidelines. My account is 3 years old; I've been doing studies on how to work with this website; in no means the first article is Promo or COI; is not even trying to be...I know what promo and advertising is; that does not even equal to such traits of the meaning; I'm just saying... Would love to continue my first work, so I can have a good rep and learn from it, by correcting the issues. I read on Wikipedia that you can correct, upgrade and edit articles; that was my idea from the beginning, if there's a wrong on my articles; I can't correct anything if a article is removed or resetted to the point, I have rewrite everything. I always make sure if my article is in the search engine, so if somebody directly came to my talk and let me know, "this paragraph is promo", I'll go to my article and change it...but nobody did that and instead spitefully "speedy delete". Speedy Delete are for those who refuse to change; I've never refused to change...but somebody on this site purposefully removes my article and then start claiming random guideline errors I'm doing, which I have no intention on doing, on purpose... Just to purposefully label me a rule breaker? How is that proper justice? That's just spiteful and personal actions. I wish good health to everybody, cause it seems good word and reasoning are offensive to some on this website; so stay good hearted and have a nice day :-)  Omni Maximum (talk) 18:55, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Admins And Other Admin Assistance Refuse To Highlight
I want all Wikipedia users understand, the people in my talks, refuse to go into my article and [https://www.computerhope.com/issues/ch001669.htm#:~:text=paragraph%20of%20text.-,How%20to%20highlight%20text%20using%20your%20keyboard,go%20of%20the%20Shift%20key. Highlight] (blue mark it and paste on my talk) what's in there, so I can go fix the issues. So with my understanding...they don't care for what I write...they only care to spam "Speedy Delete" and abuse privileges'... the only admins that are reasonable are Liz and Rsjaffe, to my understanding with me; the others that are jumping me, like I'm a boogeyman...I don't know that much...but they sure like to act like "saints" with everybody else, after they bully someone like me on the low down, with their privileges...lol! I'm sure they're non-black, so I'm certain the many reasons why they would come at someone like me, whose a Black Wikipedian, making an article about a black artist...that's not me...but I believe is impactful and deserve recognition. From the beginning I was never this type of talker, but ever since this week, I've been ambushed with guideline violations, for something I have no intentions...I already know the type of people I'm dealing; with special privileges'. I've been trying to put people in good light, but when someone forcing me in a bad light, I have to speak my truth. Shout out to Liz and Rsjaffe; the only people so far on good terms with me; I wish you and others like you the best and have a good day. Omni Maximum (talk) 19:29, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

My Intensions
I came here to make an article and in the future articles; if I really want to promo; I'd use promo platforms with followers and subscribers; Wikipedia does not have followers or subscribers... So I find it hilarious that an article I'm still gonna work on, no matter what, before I move on to another article, is considered adverting and promo; also spam... Its also funny how I'm being accused of gaming a system...just because I change my articles title to something more appealing to me, because I don't agree with the other title I placed. So I notice trolling and privileges' spoiling at best, through these people in my talk, doings; to try ruin my rep and my article on another person, I'm doing and I'm still gonna make. If they have something personal against with the person or don't believe this persons accomplishments, who I'm writing on, that's an issue (it also should not be deemed not a public article) and they want to vent their issues on me too, for knowing so much of the person...that they spam Speedy Delete and Block (with a rule bending excuse)...lol! So many sockpuppet accts stirring problems and are free, giving other Wikipedian problems and vandalizing, but these non-black people jumping me...a black person who mean no harm and trying to do better with my articles...amusing! Like I said, I'm here to make articles and only articles, so can people for the love of God...please stop ambushing me with spammy and bot behavior Speedy Delete and Blocking approval; there's no industry looking to pay me through Wikipedia for a article I make; my Wikipedia is not even connected to other sites...so stop lying and rule bending (false accusation); I'm just here to make an article...that's it... When my current article is finished, stop looking at it wrongly...again if you don't know or don't care about the person, I'm writing about...I get it...that don't mean spam or delete or promo or advertising. Stay blessed good hearted Wikipedians :-) Omni Maximum (talk) 20:02, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
 * For obvious reasons I've revoked TPA.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:48, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:57, 12 August 2022 (UTC)