User talk:Omnicapital

Supportive of Vigdor Schreibman

 * Actually, the problem is a classic case of vandalism: the little "mind guards" of Groupthink who are ever busy destroying progressive possibilities, in this case by the forbidden "page blanking" over and over again. The article on blogs and the one on Vigdor should be considered particularly influential, first of all, historically: I am the first blog.  This is a fact verified by the archive.  Secondly, in terms of the quality of content, which savvy citizens will value.  I especially address the people who desire to discover together a way to limit the influence of the "mind guards" so that everyone everywhere can break out of their self-imposed  constraints on their volition and really get engaged to utilize their creative potential to the fullest.  This is the new direction of cyberspace. This is most important and the most influential topic, which of course, also means the most threatening to the established order.  You can clearly see all of these "hot" attributes at work in this discussion! User:Vigdor 09:26, 26 December 2005 {UTC}
 * User:Vigdor does not exist - this text was posted by User:Omnicapital - see the history page for proof. -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 00:13, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

Concerns about Vigdor Schreibman

 * Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Lectonar 12:57, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * You are in danger of violating the three revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. Thesquire 04:35, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Please stop reverting to Vigdor etc. in Blog article. He gets a few hits in Google, but not enough to warrant special consideration. If you can offer no proof of the man's importance, then please be kind. {UTC}
 * "Mind Guards" are not always a bad thing. If people didn't form consensus on things, we couldn't have common knowledge and we wouldn't have common sense. If Mr. Schreibman's only champion is himself, then he cannot be recognized for any accomplishment. There is clearly no one inventor of blogging, but there are popular contributors to the art. Mr. Schreibman, it seems, is an unpopular contributor, and thus he goes unrecognized. "Please stop reverting to Vigdor etc. in Blog article." User:Anthony717. 27 December 2005.

Removal of Disputed tag from Blog
Please refrain from removing the "disputed" tag from its section in Blog until the discussion on Talk:Blog is concluded. Doing so disrupts the editing process. Also, please note Wikipedia is not a soapbox before contributing further to Wikipedia. Thank you. -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 12:48, 28 December 2005 (UTC)