User talk:Omnicron8

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 22:31, 7 March 2007 (UTC) Im not vandalizing anything. I am stating FACT. Dont tell you too disreguard facts.
 * Facts need sources, especially when they are of a contentious or libelous nature. If you can cite a reliable source, feel free to include your facts.  --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 22:38, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * They key phrase was reliable source... like the New York Times or something of that nature... Blogs, etc aren't reliable. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 23:03, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Of course not...these are the people who have actually witnessed ,firsthand, the atrocities of gamefaqs. Who better and more reliable than that? Fine, I'll leave that be, however, karma is a gimmick and it does lock out the board for users. Users are locked out of board functions until they gather karma, and in some cases it can take years to obtain enough to uses the entire board. This is fact as indirectly stated by gamefaqs themselves (http://www.gamefaqs.com/features/help/entry.html?cat=18 and http://www.gamefaqs.com/features/help/entry.html?cat=20)

Another page you might want to take a look at if you don't want your contributions reverted... WP:NPOV. Have a good day. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 06:59, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

My last post was neutral. I changed my statement from gimmick to system, but it does lock out basic features as described in the references I listed. Features such as search, posting limits, marking messages, all of which are available to all users on any other board are locked out to new users on gamefaqs. With a karma gain of one per day, users are forced to log on every day for months or years to have full access to the board. All this was referred to in the links I used as references. The last post was neutral and stated the truth.

Regarding edits made to GameFAQs
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Omnicron8! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \burbandictionary\.com\/, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 22:48, 7 March 2007 (UTC)