User talk:Omranic

Welcome!
Hello, Omranic, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Stefan2 (talk) 10:41, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Ampricot-logo.png


A tag has been placed on File:Ampricot-logo.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 10:41, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ampricot


A tag has been placed on Ampricot, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. TheLongTone (talk) 10:43, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not for product announcements
If you really think you have removed unambiguous advertising/promotion portions when your new version includes "full-fledged and lightweight... easy to install and use... excellent out-of-the-box solution... simply works like a charm... Exciting Features & Cutting Edge Technologies.. ", then you are either too close to your subject or you have been too long in the PR/advertising trade. Wikipedia is not here to help promote your new system, and anything like that is deleted at sight.

Please read the guideline on WP:Conflict of interest. JohnCD (talk) 11:27, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Ampricot
Hello ,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, Ampricot, may be copied from http://www.ampricot.com/. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 12:27, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Advice
Wikipedia is so keen to encourage everyone to come and edit that it does not do as much as (in my opinion) it should to explain at sign-on time what it is for and what it is not for. I would like to see something on the lines of: "This is a project to build an encyclopedia. If you would like to help with that, you are very welcome, click here to create an account; but if you have come here to write about yourself, your band, your company, or anything you are closely associated with, this is probably not the site for you." I have yet to persuade people to do that, but I think it would save a lot of disappointment and wasted effort.

As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia is selective about subjects for articles: the criterion used is called WP:Notability, and is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Myspace, Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones and anything based on press releases. The test is, have people independent of the subject thought it significant enough to write substantial comment about?

As your product is newly released, it is unlikely that will yet have attracted the sort of independent comment necessary; that is not to its discredit, but it means it is too early for an encyclopedia article. Encyclopedias are not in the new-product announcement business.

For other issues, see User:JohnCD/Not a noticeboard, which I wrote because I have this conversation so often.

Before proceeding, think hard about notability, because if you cannot demonstrate it your article will not be accepted. People often waste a great deal of time and energy trying to make something appear notable which is not. See WP:42 for what it means.

If you want to proceed, go to Help:Userspace draft and fill in the name. That will create a draft page where you can work on the article, with a "Submit" button to send it, when it is finished, to WP:Articles for creation, where an experienced user will check it and either accept it or give you feedback. Before writing, read WP:Your first article. When writing, remember that you are not writing for your company aiming at potential customers, you are writing for Wikipedia aiming at the general encyclopedia reader. Don't give long lists of features that make it look like a product catalogue entry - you can link to your website for anyone who wants the detail. Read WP:PEACOCK. The tone should not tell the reader whether you personally think the product is good or bad.

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 22:39, 1 October 2012 (UTC)