User talk:Omt2e/People in the Room

Guidelines for evaluating a draft article – upload comments to the Talk page of the article you are evaluating. Lead

1. Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes.

2. Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? The “background” section does not seem to be described in the lead, except by the phrase “Argentinian author Norah Lange.”

3. Does the lead contain information that is not present in the article? I could not find another mention of the award this book received elsewhere in the article.

4. Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It is concise.

Comments on the lead: I like it. It reads just like a wikipedia article to me, which I suppose is the point. Content

1. Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes, except for (see below).

2. Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? I thought I heard it mentioned somewhere that content in book articles that describes the author in detail is often deleted because it “belongs on the author page.” I can’t remember where I got that from anymore, but if it’s true then it may bode poorly for the “background” section.

Comments on Content:I suppose the article as a whole could be longer, but I’m not sure what length we’re supposed to be going for, so take that with a grain of salt. Tone and Balance

1. Is the article written in a neutral tone? Yes.

2. Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particularposition/interpretation? No.

3. Are there viewpoints/interpretations that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Not that I could tell.

4. Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No.

Comments on Tone and balance: As I said earlier, this reads with the tone of a wikipedia article. Y’all did a good job with this. Sources and References

''1. Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? At least one source per paragraph, except the summary.'' Yup! You have more than enough in each paragraph.

2. Are there at least 6-8 sources cited? Yes.

3. Is the citation information complete? Yes, as far as I can tell.

''4. Check a few links. Do they work?'' Yes.

Comments on Sources and references: Everything looks in order to me. Organization

1. Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? The last few sentences of the “themes” section seemed a bit vague and convoluted.

2. Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No, none that I saw.

3. Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into at least 4 sections, including a summary, that reflect the major/interesting points of the novel? I’m not sure if “4 sections” includes the Lead and References sections. If not then the article is one section short.

Comments on Organization: I felt the organization was pretty solid overall. Images and Media

1. Does the article include at least 1 image? Yup!

2. Are images well-captioned to relate it to the article? Yup!

3. Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes, from what Owen has told me, and from the copyright info about the image that pops up when I click on it. Comments on Images/Media: I really like that portrait of the Brontë sisters, because I really like their books. Cool that they get a cameo on your article. Info box

1. Is there an infobox? Yes.

2. Does the info box contain relevant information: title, author, translator, language of original text, publisher, date of publication (original and trans into English)? It has all of those.

Comments on Infobox: A very nicely put together info box. Me gusta mucho.

Celtqueen (talk) 18:28, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

I did my own peer review here []

Nice Brady956 (talk) 22:23, 8 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Looking great! Need to make the THEMES section read in complete sentences. Implement the advice of your peer reviewers. You are almost ready to submit! Bravo! &#42;Yseut229* (talk) 16:35, 11 April 2020 (UTC)