User talk:Omuurgen

Speedy deletion nomination of Moodcrawler
Hello Omuurgen,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Moodcrawler for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 20:07, 20 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Please note that you should not remove speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, even if you think you have solved the problem (or that the problem does not exist). Thanks. ubiquity (talk) 20:24, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Moodcrawler"
A page you created, Moodcrawler, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a website, but it does not indicate how it is important or significant, and thus why it should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for websites in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. -- Rrburke (talk) 20:18, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Please read Notability and Verifiability. Deb (talk) 12:14, 21 November 2014 (UTC)