User talk:OneDirecection

April 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kayla has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kayla was changed by OneDirecection (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.962657 on 2014-04-15T22:10:37+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:10, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Grand Canal (China). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Grand Canal (China) was changed by OneDirecection (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.852094 on 2014-04-16T20:55:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:55, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Grand Canal (China) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. ... disco spinster   talk  20:58, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Jehovah's Witnesses
I note your edit at Jehovah's Witnesses (since reverted). The edit was reverted because it was an unsourced assertion, in an unencylopedic tone. It also did not accurately represent the beliefs of Jehovah's Witnesses, who do not believe that Satan 'made himself a snake', but rather that he 'used a serpent, much as a ventriloquist uses a dummy'. In future, please provide sources, and ensure that your edits agree with those sources. (Additionally, a person who is a member of the religion would usually say they are "a Jehovah's Witness" or "one of Jehovah's Witnesses" and not "a Jehovah witness".) Thanks.-- Jeffro 77 (talk) 08:38, 17 April 2014 (UTC)