User talk:One Fifty Five

is/was vs are/were in Liverpool F.C.
In a recent edit, you changed one or more words from one international variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect other forms of English in Wikipedia articles. Please note that in British English, groups and organizations are treated as plural, so Liverpool Football Club are... is correct usage.

The guidelines are simple. For subjects exclusively related to Britain (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. If it is an international topic, use the same form of English the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to the other, even if you don't normally use the version the article is written in. Respect other people's versions of English. They in turn should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any queries about all this, just ask anyone on Wikipedia and they will help you. Enjoy your time on the internet's fastest growing encyclopædia/encyclopedia. Thank you. Ytny 14:13, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Multiracial
who is multiracial and who is not is not determined by what we as individuals consider races, but rather, if there is a source that says that the person is multiracial. so, if there is a source, they stay on the list. Colorfulharp233 02:27, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

i see what you are saying, and it makes sense, but wikipedia doesn't go by common sense. it goes by reliable sources. so, if a reliable source says a person is multiracial, then we can put them on the list. Colorfulharp233 18:20, 2 September 2006 (UTC)