User talk:One Night Reader

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 04:07, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

September 2021
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to W. H. Dimond (barquentine), please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 21:09, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Short descriptions
Hello, I just wanted to ask if you could take a little better look at the short descriptions you are adding to articles before saving them. Some of them do not really make sense, do not succinctly describe the target article, or are grammatically improper (like using "co" for "company" or "corporation"). There are some cases where a short description might not be required, as when the title of an article describes the subject of that article more or less completely. Thank you. Chubbles (talk) 11:49, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Thankyou for your comments; which I have noted. I have reread the "Learn more" info...between 2 and 12 words is recommended. I can't find anything 'bout commonly used abbreviations being unacceptable. On the Edits page it is showing those contributions which I've already made, as having a "Perfect" edit quality and a tick in a green circle...so I'm finding your criticisms somewhat contrary. Regards...... One Night Reader (talk) 01:30, 9 October 2021 (UTC)


 * You want the description to be legible to a reader who knows nothing about a topic; abbreviating things like "prog" for "program" inhibits understanding. I don't know what algorithm you're using to evaluate the edits, but if it is rating the edits as "perfect", something's wrong with the algorithm. Some of the descriptions simply don't make grammatical sense - please exercise good judgment in addition to relying on automated assessments. Chubbles (talk) 13:14, 12 October 2021 (UTC)