User talk:Onedayinmay/sandbox

"Great report Alex. I was happy that you chose Peter I because he is a classic character from history but also I think you're not likely to have too many problems with bias in the article. You gave great details about both articles and clearly outlined the limitations of the Wikipedia article.  I was impressed that you noticed the difference in writing style as the articles I reviewed had similar issues.  Apparently good editing does matter! I thought you could have proved your point with a few long quotes from each article to showcase the difference in writing styles. I would have also been interested in a bit more technical information about the Wiki such as who the contributors are and how many people are accessing this article.  Since this is a Russian topic I was also wondering if you noticed any differences in how the narrative of Peter's life is described compared what you may have heard or been taught growing up. Overall great job."

Tim Yale 13:32, 23 November 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by T.yale0001 (talk • contribs)

Mariah Langille - This was a great assessment and great resources as well. I loved how you got into the subsections for Peter the Great and went on to explain why they were significant. You were clear and concise and did really well. EnterLibaryGirl (talk) 18:42, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks reviewers for this helpful and detailed, and positive feedback! Libringreen (talk) 01:17, 4 December 2012 (UTC)