User talk:Oneiros/Archive 1

Template:User girlfriend-wish
Hi, I notice that you are using Template:User girlfriend-wish, which has been moved to User:UBX/girlfriendwish. The link currently being used on your page is a cross-namespace redirect and will probably not last. It may be advisable to change the link. Thanks. —Mi r a  02:43, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

TeX mascot
Hi Oneiros, you recently removed the TeX mascot image from the TeX article, which is probably a correct thing to do whoever the copyright holder is. However, if I remember well a exchange of emails that we had a few months ago, you were ready to provide this image under a licence acceptable for use in Wikipedia; is that still possible ? All the best, Schutz 12:04, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Watchmen
Thanks for fixing that link! --Erik 01:27, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Sighrik's talk page
please stop threatening me. it's a pretty lame way to treat new users. how are people supposed to know you can't erase messages after you read them? if that's not even just something you made up. Sighrik 17:21, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * At least you've learned to sign your posts. --Oneiros 17:36, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

UJRE
The ticket from the 2002 farewell tour on my pinboard reads "The United Jazz + Rock Ensemble" ... Never mind ... --Pjt56 20:02, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Portable Document Format
I have changed the article again to indicate that PDF is an open standard and is not proprietary. I did this after reading both of these articles, to see how Wikipedia defines "open" and "proprietary". In Talk:Portable Document Format you'll find this has already been the subject of some discussion a while back – to which you may of course wish to add. Notinasnaid 14:35, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Brad Hines
Oneiros,

Did you get the rebuttal information on the "Brad Hines" talk page? Please do not remove this entry. Simply check up on the references. There person is a pivotal person in the domain name industry, the domain industry is not exactly going to suddenly have less signifigance, nor is the president of one of the leading companies within the industry. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Utzchips (talk • contribs) 2006-11-01T12:47:20.


 * The talk page had no content when I added the template. Oh, and please sign your posts.--Oneiros 10:52, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

TeX Users Group
Hi Oneiros, I see you are interested in the logo of TUG; as you can see, I have inserted it in the article so that it is obvious what it looks like. However, as one can see in the page http://www.tug.org/, the logo is not used in text, where the commonly used version "TeX" is the norm (as seen as well on Donald Knuth's homepage). There was been a discussion about this on Talk:TeX a while ago; while the TeX logo is very nice when typeset using TeX itself, it should probably not be used in other context when technical limitations makes it impossible to reproduce anyway. All the best, Schutz 23:06, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Regarding 142.151.175.39
Sorry, but what WP:AIV deals with obvious vandalism. What has been engaging in is a content dispute and I would hesitate to exercise my sole authority to block him/her. Edit warring should be brought up at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents for review by multiple administrators. --  Netsnipe  ►  16:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Minor edits
You posted a comment on how you use minor edits on the talk page of my IP (User talk:83.227.141.19) which I sometimes post as when I forget to login. IP users can't flag edits as minor so the comment would only confuse a genuine new anonymous user (some one who is not just a registered user too lazy to login). The comment about that I should provide more edit summaries is very much correct. Thanks for the reminder, I have been too lazy lately. Jeltz talk  23:46, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

TeX trademark
Hi Oneiros, you made an interesting addition to TeX about the trademarking of "TeX" by the AMS, referring to p. 1 of the TeXbook. In my copy, I can see the reference to TEX, but I don't see any information about the rejection of the TeX trademark — quite the opposite in fact, since my copy (which dates from after 1996) still indicate that TeX is a trademark of the AMS. Do you have any other source about this information ? All the best, Schutz 14:32, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, I contacted Barbara Beeton. Her words: “it was, and is, a claimed trademark, but rejected for registration - at the time this was tried, ‘TEX’ (all caps) was registered by Honeywell for some sort of text processing system.” The TEX-trademark is mentioned in the TeXbook.--Oneiros 16:46, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Hum, this is frustrating because I can't find anything in my copy (at least not on p. 1). I may have a look at the online TeX code for the book, it should be up to date (and I will be able to perform a search on the whole text at once). The problem with Barbara Beeton's quote is that we can not cite it (it seems to be a personal communication, not something good enough for a reference in Wikipedia). However, I have found the record in the USPTO database, indicating that the registration was abandoned in 1985; this should be enough to write something for the article. Cheers, Schutz 23:30, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * According to her, the book is not in error because it's still a claimed trademark. If you have a link to USPTO, please share. Also note that the Metafont trademark has lapsed; this can be found quite easily at the USPTO.--Oneiros 08:53, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I haven't found a direct link; start from http://www.uspto.gov/main/trademarks.htm, click "Search" on the right, choose "Basic search", then use search term "73478133" and pick "Serial number" as field, and it should get you to the right page. Schutz 08:17, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Gulf War and minor edits
Oneiros's posting on my talk page, my response.Nwe 16:47, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Please remember to mark your edits as minor when (and only when) they genuinely are minor edits (see Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one (and vice versa) is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' --Oneiros 18:12, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Huh? I didn't mark any edits to Gulf War as minor.Nwe 16:44, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
 * No response, if you're going to post warning messages relating to wiki policy on someone's page, you should be prepared to respond to any queries that arise from that.Nwe 15:38, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry. You didn't mark (IMHO) minor edits as so. But I'm not going to pursue this; take it as a friendly reminder.--Oneiros 20:47, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * You couldn't pursue it anywhere even if you wanted to, generally whether to mark an edit as minor is left up to the discretion of the editor, besides which the message you posted on my talk page was a warning against marking major edits as minor.Nwe 10:15, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
 * “Marking a major change as a minor one (and vice versa)”.--Oneiros 22:06, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Bullocks. 71.227.26.32 02:21, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Editing Peter Pan
Hey man i never edited Peter Pan???? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.236.132.15 (talk) 09:47, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Ugh!
Sorry for bollucksing up that revert on Sports Car International Top Sports Cars. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.183.93.98 (talk) 23:24, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

ahaha
userbox in da mayn usre paig bostes bout 1300 edits?

hahaha

also, hao 'tis vandalism when I lief an invis'ble HTML editor's note on a'paeg?

71.227.26.32 02:22, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, I see, I'm not important enough to warrant a response. Typical Wikipedia editor. 71.227.26.32 19:03, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * You are not important enough, that's true. Are you related to User:Mmcannis?--Oneiros 19:59, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Your templates
Don't template the regulars. Thanks. Badagnani (talk) 20:20, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Germany Invitation
--Zeitgespenst (talk) 14:26, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Issuing vandalism warnings
This is clearly not vandalism. Blnguyen, an admin and arbitrator, added content from List of Lebanese Australians to Lebanese Australian because it was short enough for inclusion in the main article. Please re-familiarize yourself with WP:VANDALISM to avoid similar mistakes in the future. Thanks, Nishkid64 (talk) 00:31, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry, my fault.--Oneiros (talk) 00:32, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Opj logo.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Opj logo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:07, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Do you work there?
I have worked there over 19 years, DO NOT erase my work please. If you do not work there I suggest you leave me alone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.164.47.2 (talk) 21:08, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Friendly note regarding talk page messages
Hello. As a recent editor to User talk:80.195.151.245, I wanted to leave a friendly reminder that as per WP:USER, editors may remove messages at will from their own talk pages. While we may prefer that comments be archived instead, policy does not prohibit users -including anonymous editors like this one- from deleting messages from their own talk pages. The only kinds of talk page messages that cannot be removed (as per WP:BLANKING) are declined unblock requests (but only while blocks are still in effect), confirmed sockpuppet notices, or IP header templates (for unregistered editors). These exceptions only exist in order to keep a user from potentially gaming the system. Thanks, Kralizec! (talk) 15:39, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Ole Nydahl and Diamond Way: My Story
My name is Hannah. I am keeping my surname secret to prevent the harassment and death threats I have received from members of the Diamond Way cult since I left.

I have a 5 month-old son after Diamond Way's leader, Ole Nydahl brainwashed me to have sex with him and forbid me to have an abortion.

Diamond Way is a dangerous cult and people need to be warned of this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sexy spicy hannah bw (talk • contribs) 18:01, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry for what happened to you, but Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and as such we try to follow WP:NPOV; please see WP:NOT. Our article on Ole Nydahl has already a section Controversies; the same is true of Diamond Way Buddhism. IMHO that are the only places were your story might belong.--Oneiros (talk) 18:28, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Military history of Australia during World War II
Hi, I've been working on this article for a while, and I guess that I'm principly responsible for its current length. Do you have any suggestions on how it could best be reduced in size? I agree that the article is rather long, but I don't consider it excessive given the scale of the events it covers - I am, however, obviously biased though, and the more eyes on the article the better! I'm planning to nominate this article for A-class status in the near future, and possibly a FAC after that, so this is a great time to trim it. Nick-D (talk) 23:25, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * As you might have noticed, I've already nominated it for GA, which would be the next step. :-) It will reach FAC eventually, I'm sure. But let's discuss splitting it up on the talk page.
 * Thanks for the nomination, and I agree that the article's talk page would be the best place for the discussion. Nick-D (talk) 03:07, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the A-class nomination, but as a general note these nominations should normally be initiated by editors who have made a significant contribution to the article. It doesn't matter in this instance though. I'm also a bit concerned that you nominated the article as soon as the GA review was posted without responding to any of the changes suggested by the GA reviewer. Nick-D (talk) 09:41, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi Oneiros. I thought that instead of cluttering up the review page of the above, I would reply here. :) In response to your comment that nominations by a non-primary/major contributor are not mentioned in the official rules, it can be common place at GAN for some of the GA "supervisors" to remove nominations by a non-primary/major contributor, and such nominations can come under much scrutiny at FAC. I can't really comment for ACR though, as I have not seen it done there before. I appreciate that your nomination in this case was in good faith, though. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 15:43, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

FYI
Not an experiment, an error. The nature of errors somewhat precludes the prospect of confining them to the sandbox. 143.239.1.153 (talk) 01:34, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

ConTeXt polish
Hi,

As you can see I improve ConTeXt article, putting essentially references and sources. But today I drop the section "features", because I think it's like an advertising section. I know you are frequently editing user of ConTeXt. Can you give some look for consolidating changes.: Remove section is a big change.

For the other hand, can you improve the language of article. English is my non-native lang. and so many typos are produced.

With my best efforts. Xan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xan2 (talk • contribs) 17:46, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

warning vandals
Thanks for the heads up. I will take more care in future,. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:09, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

GA
Replied  YellowMonkey  ( cricket calendar poll! ) 07:00, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Thank you
Oh okay, I'll remember that. I just joined Wikipedia a few months ago (even though I am an active contributor at Wikia), so I'm new to some of the MediaWiki. -- Alxeedo  TALK   —Preceding undated comment added 00:46, 16 July 2009 (UTC).

Vandals
I do occasionally warn vandals when I believe that the vandalism is bad enough, but I try to avoid it at most other times. I think there is a potential that if you warn a vandal, the attention could encourage them to do more. Thanks, Hayden120 (talk) 00:26, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Template:SharedIPPublic
I'm not sure I understand what you mean that it's broken. Parameter 3 seems to be working ok on pages like User talk:65.88.88.202.--Pharos (talk) 17:43, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * If #3 is not used (like on the template page and on User talk:66.213.29.2), it looks quite broken. Can you make it optional?--Oneiros (talk) 18:51, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah, I think I've fixed it now: .--Pharos (talk) 05:40, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Yosi Sergant
Wow, you're fast (and good)! I was just about to delete the vandalism on the Yosi Sergant page, but you got in there like a lightening bolt. Thanks. --Badums (talk) 19:38, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Adobe LifeCyle Reader Extensions
Thanks for your feedback. Could you comment on why FormRouter's external link is not considered spam. While "Technically" our service is not Adobe lifecyle reader extension, we do provide the functionality that most people who are interested in ARES are looking for, and at no charge. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.251.110.124 (talk • contribs) 21:32, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Elf Sternberg... huh???
I'm a long-time friend of Elf's and it's a well known fact he enjoys sushi, in fact he has many blog posts about eating sushi. How in the world can you claim that including information about the foods he likes is considered "vandalism???" That's flat out ridiculous. 12.36.174.35 (talk) 07:58, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Reverted. Sorry.--Oneiros (talk) 08:06, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

de:Wikipedia:Adminwiederwahl/Nolispanmo
Ich habe deine Unterschrift gestrichen weil deshalb. --Euku 20:54, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Ebenso sind gestrichen:, ,. --Euku 10:50, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

de:Wikipedia:Adminwiederwahl/Zollernalb
Hallo Oneiros, schreibst du noch, warum du eine Wiederwahl wünschst? Grüße --Zollernalb (talk) 22:12, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

de:Wikipedia:Adminwiederwahl/GDK
Hi, es würde mich interessieren, warum Du meine Wiederwahl wünschst. Gruß, --GDK (talk) 22:22, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

de:Wikipedia:Adminwiederwahl/Emes
Hi, es würde mich interessieren, warum Du meine Wiederwahl wünschst. Gruß, --Martin Se (talk) 23:21, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

de:Wikipedia:Adminwiederwahl/Minderbinder
Hi, es würde mich interessieren, warum Du meine Wiederwahl wünschst. Gruß, --12.151.174.6 (talk) 00:10, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

de:Wikipedia:Adminwiederwahl/Florian Adler
Hi, es würde mich interessieren, warum Du meine Wiederwahl wünschst. Gruß, --fl-adler •λ• 05:21, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Java and Portal
I recently posted the following text on Wikipedia regarding the creation of a new computing-related project:

'WikiProject Java is a Wikipedian community that aims to better organize information in articles related to the Java programming language and its platform.
 * If I'm cor-rec-to, there are about 900 articles on Java technology in Wikipedia, which may be more than ALL other programming languages articles combined...
 * At least, it's more than for C++, and there IS a C++ WikiProject...
 * And it's MUCH more than the .NET WikiProject with 82 articles...
 * There is also a Ruby project and a Python portal so...
 * Now you can also see a proposal for the Java Portal (temp location).'

Please support this initiative,  AlainR345  TechnoWikiGeek 06:00, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

de:Christoph Seidler
Hallo,

die von S1 gelöscht Version bestand aus den Worten "Fuck You!" Worin siehst du da den Bedarf für eine Wiederwahl? Sollen Admins Vandalismus nicht mehr löschen? Gruß --Pfvmh 21:37, 19. Okt. 2009 (CEST)

Im übrigen wartet eine Reihe von Leuten (siehe die Absätze oben) immer noch auf eine Erklärung. --Euku 09:19, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Das ist freundlich gesagt ihr Problem. Ich bin keine Erklärung schuldig.--Oneiros (talk) 10:33, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * auf Grund dieser Ansage, werde ich ein Benutzersperrverfahren gengen dich einleiten--Martin Se (talk) 00:27, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Worauf wartest Du?--Oneiros (talk) 00:44, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

de:Wikipedia:Adminwiederwahl/Kuebi
Nach meiner Ansicht versucht Kuebi deine Stimme lächerlich zu machen. Vielleicht solltest du dir das noch einmal ansehen. --Wikieditoroftoday (talk) 12:20, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Soulmate
I've changed your 'nonsense' on this to 'web'. It looks like a plug for an Indonesian web something or other, written in Bahasa Indonesia (which used to be known as Malay until Indonesia became independent...). Peridon (talk) 00:59, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Wiederwahl 32X
Hallo. Ich habe nach Diskussion auf WP:A/N soeben die zu früh eingeleitete Wiederwahl von 32X abgebrochen, da dieser mittlerweile fristgerecht eine eigene Kandidatur eingeleitet hat. Ich möchte dich daher bitten, deine Stimme in der aktuellen Kandidatur erneut abzugeben. Viele Grüße --Leithian (talk) 13:03, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Daddy's Home.
I really didn't appreciate being attacked like that. I have not edited a Pibgorn page and have no idea what you are talking about. This is my first edit and I saw that one of the hyper links were mistyped and corrected it. This will also be my last, since I will not edit again do to the "shoot first and ask questions later" attitude here.

Best wishes.69.205.47.58 (talk) 13:32, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

SUL
This entry exists for the purpose of providing a diff on my home wiki to submit to the following projects for usurpation of the username oneiros there:
 * en.wiktionary.org
 * en.wikinews.org
 * en.wikiquote.org
 * fr.wikipedia.org
 * ✅ Popo le Chien throw a bone 07:59, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

All of the requests were made from the IP 91.1.102.162.--Oneiros (talk) 21:20, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * it.wikipedia.org (IP 91.1.93.5) --Oneiros (talk) 22:02, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

The asof tag
Hello, Oneiros. Why use the asof tag, as you did on the Pandorum article, when it is the British way of presenting dates? I get using it on British-centered articles, but not when an article is mostly or completely in American format. Flyer22 (talk) 03:59, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * See the documentation for why to use it. I've added the " " parameter.--Oneiros (talk) 16:30, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay. And thank you for the change. Flyer22 (talk) 19:10, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Noch glaube ich, dass de zu retten ist ...
Oneiros, es fällt schwer, Dein Urteilsvermögen über einzelne Admins, aber vor allem auch über die Entscheidungsstrukturen in der deutschen Wikipedia nachzuvollziehen, wenn Du Dich nur lesend (bzw. abstimmend) einbringst. Falls Du an einer Diskussion hierüber interessiert bist, könntest Du mir das in de mitteilen? Ich hab hier keine BEO. Gruss --Port(u*o)s (talk) 00:41, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Hallo Oneiros, ich wollte fragen, ob wir unsere Diskussion über die de-wiki noch fortführen wollen (bzw. beginnen), oder ob das Interesse daran eingeschlafen ist - das wäre durchaus beidseitig, muss ich gestehen, aber ich will bei Dir andererseits auch nicht den Eindruck erwecken, Dich nur irgendwie abgespeist zu haben. Gruss --Port(u*o)s (talk) 12:33, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Kein Problem. Ja, mein Interesse ist eingeschlafen - de ist durchaus wichtig, aber ich investiere meine Energie lieber hier.--Oneiros (talk) 16:02, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Dann bis irgendwann mal :-) --Port(u*o)s (talk) 22:02, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Usurp on it.wiki
Done. Open now your account. Bye. -- Roberto  Segnali all'Indiano  04:27, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Karm a  fist  20:31, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

ClueBot
I guess we should take this as a friendly invitation for assistance. Want to do the honors or shall I? Rivertorch (talk) 15:30, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Go ahead. Btw: Twinkle has code for finding the section of the current month.--Oneiros (talk) 16:00, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmm. I'll see if I can get to it today or tomorrow. (I don't use Twinkle. Maybe I should.) Rivertorch (talk) 16:17, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Need help with auto-archiving
Hey there! I've seen somewhere that you are experienced with the setting up of auto-archiving with the use of bots. Would be as kind as to help out with this page? Not sure why I can't get it to work. Thank you in advance. Talk:Islamic_terrorism--JokerXtreme (talk) 15:21, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi again, sorry to bother. I tried to setup auto-archiving for this page Talk:Macedonian_nationalism and it isn't working. Can you point out to me what am I doing wrong, so that I can work this out in future occasions?--JokerXtreme (talk) 00:42, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Someone else beat me to it: You must check the archive parameter carefully.--Oneiros (talk) 00:45, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi...
The Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab talk page does not seem to be archiving at 7 days. On another point, if I would like that done to a few other pages, do I request that of someone, or is there a way I should do it myself? Tx.--Epeefleche (talk) 22:54, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The bot keeps at least 10 threads, and there are currently 10 threads, so it won't archive anything until there are 11. And see Template:Archiveme.--Oneiros (talk) 23:12, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Perfect. Tx.--Epeefleche (talk) 02:28, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Hmmm ... I seem to have made a mistake in my archiving effort, which you've kindly repaired ... but can't seem to divine from the diffs what it was ... can you help me understand what I did wrong in the formatting? Many thanks.--Epeefleche (talk) 00:46, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Where?--Oneiros (talk) 01:30, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Canvassing
The editors whose position was soundly rejected at Software notability are very active at AfDs, and they keep voting according to their own standards, even if the no longer link to that essay. The arbcom decided that such behavior is unimpeachable, so the only way to counter their actions is to counter-vote the delete votes when they are made for invalid reasons. Please add WikiProject Deletion_sorting/Software, and possibly WikiProject_Deletion sorting/Computing, and WikiProject Deletion_sorting/Internet to your watch list. Pcap ping  15:08, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Talk archives, attitude
I've replied here. In short, in future you will take the time to examine the fuller contexts of edits before reverting them and making ridiculous assumptions of "vandalism". I've better things to do than waste time on people who cannot take five minutes to assume good faith. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 21:23, 21 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Furthermore, considering that it appears that your primary contribution these days is setting up or altering talk archiving you've got some nerve pulling out WP:OWN the minute someone steps on your "territory". I see you've unilaterally altered the archiving parameters of dozens of articles without discussion, among them talk:association football and talk:Office Open XML. Unless explicit consensus has been reached that this should change, you should not alter the banner used or archiving size on existing archive setups. If you're starting archiving afresh on a page then you can do what you like. I've reverted these changes on pages which I'm actively involved in, but as far as I'm concerned you should undo the rest of them yourself until they are discussed as an act of good faith. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 10:40, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

enWQ usurpation
Hallo, and sorry for delay but now usurpation you requested has done. Thank you for your patience, --Aphaia (talk) 12:39, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Life
Hello. I noticed that the Mizabot performed its first Life talk page archive on Feb. 02, however it archived only one of many (all) old sections. Could you check it out please? Thank you. It seems too complex for me to do it manually now. Cheers, --BatteryIncluded (talk) 04:30, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * It keeps at least ten threads - and there are ten threads left. Only the first has no time stamps.--Oneiros (talk) 09:04, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Edit Sumaries
Why did you put a section on my User talk page asking me to write a summary of my changes because I only edited spelling and grammar, not content? --Pgecaj (talk) 03:59, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Because you should always put something in the edit summary, even if it's only "typo".--Oneiros (talk) 14:07, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Archiving at Talk:T. E. Lawrence: Thanks!
Thank you so much Oneiros! I was away from Wikipedia for a month and could only just now get back to this. I thought that the problem might have been with the, but was afraid that if I set it to  , the system would number the first archive as. The MizaBot documentation should make the notes for this parameter a little more clear, don’t you think? I am so glad that someone with more experience came along and fixed it. Thanks again! — Spike Toronto  20:27, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Archiving at Talk:T. E. Lawrence: Query
Hi Oneiros. There is a section that is now at the top of the above-captioned article talk page — Introductory sentence — that is unsigned and to which there was never a response. Without a timestamp, it will never archive. I examined the complete history of the edits and cannot easily determine which edit it was in order to add a signature and timestamp with Unsigned. (Perhaps the editor did not use the New Section tab at the top of the page and merely added it at the then bottom.) However, when I look at a pre-archived version of the page, I see that it was then situated between an entry dated January 16, 2007, and another entry dated May 4, 2007. How do you suggest editing this section so that it will archive? Is there a protocol for such instances? Thanks! Sorry to be a pest … — Spike Toronto  20:45, 3 March 2010 (UTC)


 * I'd archive that manually: Just move the section to the archive page at the right position yourself. Be bold!--Oneiros (talk) 14:08, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

✅   I determined who added the comment, and when, by looking at the diffs between 2007-01-16 and 2007-05-04. I then added the signature and timestamp. After which I manually inserted it where it belongs in Archive 1 (see here  and here ). Thanks for all your help Oneiros! — Spike Toronto  18:34, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

The edit to the OpenBSD page
The article was verified, it was carried by almost every major IT news site. The reference I provided was from DistroWatch which links back to an OS news story. Please take more care in the future when accusing people.

97.104.82.1 (talk) 07:17, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Rockwell Diamonds
Boss, could you explain why this company is not notable. I left a note on the discussion page. Could you respond there. Thanks a lot.--History Sleuth (talk) 01:29, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Please see the references added to the article and let me know if you still think that it is not notable. We can further discuss. Thanks --History Sleuth (talk) 02:07, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Editing a Page
Received your note regarding leaving a note when editing a page (Diane Carey). However, I have to wonder why you singled me out on this. I notice that almost no one leaves a note when they edit, including all the preceding editors of the Diane Carey page. I especially would have appreciated a note from the person who stubbified all my hard research work away. If others followed the practice of leaving notes, I would be more comfortable doing so as well. Dan Quigley (talk) 05:05, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

I never edited Genghis Khan
I think you made a mistake. On my talk page, you said that I edited Genghis Khan, but I didn't. Just letting you know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.88.82.138 (talk) 07:29, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

About Nattasha Singh - I would have declined the Speedy Delete nomination
Hello, this appears to be a new editor. He needs help on this actress Nattasha Singh. She gets ghits. Thanks, --Morenooso (talk) 10:11, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Chris Jarvis (rower)
Hi, I removed the speedy deletion tag you placed on this page. Although page itself wasn't well-written, being an Olympic athlete is a major claim of notability so the A7 tag didn't apply. I believe the subject meets both WP:ATHLETE and WP:N, but you are welcome to take the article to AfD if you disagree.  Them From  Space  08:08, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Greece
Yes it is a fact that Greek bond market auctions in 2010 have all been oversubscribed. If you want I can send you the FT references.

That means that at auction there were many more investors bidding for the debt than debt was on auction.

At the same time yields have risen on Greek bonds.

Nevertheless every time there is a Greek Government primary auction investors have been lining up. Both of these statements are fact. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dearieme  (talk • contribs)  08:23, 24 Apr 2010 (UTC)

Articles relisted
Since a few other editors agreed with you, I've restored the articles and listed them over at AfD. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 12:28, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Please also restore Talk:Hans Hagen.--Oneiros (talk) 13:21, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Delsorting
I'm not sure how you do that, but you fail to actually add the articles to the lists; you've only added the notices to the AfDs. Pcap ping  05:04, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Must have been a brainfart. Thanks for fixing it.--Oneiros (talk) 09:48, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Overtagging
I know the article Carribean_Immigration_to_New_York is is bad shape, however 12 tags in not appropriate. Thank you.-- m o  ɳ  o  20:13, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, my edit counter states that you have 12700-ish edits, unlike the 13000 on your userpage.-- m o  ɳ  o  20:14, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Mono, I agree with your first, but not your second, statement. Edit counts for people with tons of edits can skew quite a bit, and what he has displayed on his userpage is based of this. Maybe your edit counter doesn't count deleted edits, for instance. And Oneiros, please improve the article the best you can before tagging. Happy editing, Airplaneman   ✈  21:41, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * IMHO you should be happy that I didn't WP:PRODed that sad excuse for an article in its first incarnation, but instead pointed out some of its problems.--Oneiros (talk) 22:01, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * It's not my article; I don't care. I was just letting you know that it is inappropriate to tag an article like that; just AfD/PROD it.  Also, see WP:SOFIXIT.--  m  o  n  o   22:29, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * 1. why are we complaining about silly edit counts? 2. 12 tags is a bit over the top 3. if you don't care please don't tell someone else to sofixit. And don't miscite guidelines and whatnot, wp:own is about hogging articles, not forgetting about ones you are too lazy to deal with.  — fetch ·  comms   01:05, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

No humor allowed
So no humor is ever allowed again on Talk pages. Is that the new policy? If not, then revert please. Jidanni (talk) 22:01, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:Talk. “The talk page is for discussing how to improve the article.”--Oneiros (talk) 22:32, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

More caution with tagging users behavior
Oneiros, once again... Please pay more attention before tagging users for things like vandalism. It's a serious claim that needs to be supported by evidence. If you don't know what the rules are for vandalism, don't tag users for participating in it, thanks. OH! And here are your 4 tildes :) 70.178.128.166 (talk) 18:02, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
 * It was a friendly reminder, not "tagging for vandalism".--Oneiros (talk) 19:46, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. —DoRD (talk) 20:00, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

True
My remarks about "Exchange and Mart" are true. It will be interesting to see your proof that they are not. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.149.117.81 (talk) 13:32, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Discuss them on the talk page, please.--Oneiros (talk) 13:36, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Rollback granted
I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback correctly, and for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see New admin school/Rollback and Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:10, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Archving
I have noted that you have implemented auto-archiving lately. That's good. There is few issues where I hope you could improve your implementations:
 * minthreadsleft = 10 and algo=old(30d) usually cause that oldest thread is much older then the what you put as notification 30 days. The notification then lies to the users. A better solution is to put minthreadsleft = 4 and choose a larger archive time to leave between 7 and 15 threads (or size between 25Kb and 75Kb).
 * You usually use minthreadstoarchive = 1 . My reasoning about this can be read here.
 * You usually implement indexing even if there is only one archive (Archive 1). Is it really need to have index then? We have the table of contest that list what is in the archive. I usually implement indexing once there are two archives.

I'm currently writting an essay about auto-archving. Feel free to contribute. Do not do major re-writting, if you have a different opinion about something. Instead put your critics on the talk page, so I can review your point. --Kslotte (talk) 14:01, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

I really don't want to bother
I edit wiki and I alays intend to make it better when I do. I never edit from a pov of vandalism, and a lot of the time I'm just correcting the English of non-English speaking as a first language users. Not as easy as you'd think. I have noticed a certain amount of vandalism. When I introduced a line saying that there was a theory that both the US and Iran were responsible for Lockerbie, it was altered by a registered vandal called Bert Stosser within half an hour. I understand theree are campaigns to alter the Wikipedia and the Slimvirgin case is a true one. But I don't know how to make my very reasonable changes stick. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.125.147.133 (talk) 19:01, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Which edit was that? Btw: Please sign your posts.--Oneiros (talk) 23:36, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

List of PDF software
Can you explain your edits ? They look like simple edit-warring when you provide no evidence and none has been provided. --Ronz (talk) 22:58, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Please stop removing software that is clearly notable (some have their own articles). If you think it isn't, discuss it on the talk page.--Oneiros (talk) 23:55, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't know if you believe what you're writing or not, but you're incorrect and have yet to provide any evidence to the contrary. Please take some time to at least be certain of your comments when your editing has already been pointed out to look like simple edit-warring. --Ronz (talk) 00:29, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Nitro PDF exists, so I linked their reader to that article. Am I overlooking something else? --Ronz (talk) 00:35, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Also the WP:BURDEN is on you to provide sources or other evidence that the information belongs. If you're having trouble finding it, start a discussion rather than edit-warring. --Ronz (talk) 00:36, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Re: October 2010
Alter, ich lasse mir von jemandem, der – im Vergleich zu mir zumindest – ein Wikipedia-Noob ist, nicht im hochnäsig-besserwisserischen Ton sagen, dass ich für das Entfernen eines einzelnen falsch gesetzten Satzzeichens ein großartiges Edit Summary verfassen soll. Für so einen Pupskram schreibe ich so etwas nicht. --KAMiKAZOW (talk) 01:02, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Diese Hochnäsigkeit habe ich befürchtet. Wenn Du keine Zeit hast, "typo" zu schreiben, dann kann Wikipedia auf Dich verzichten.--Oneiros (talk) 11:50, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Du kannst nicht bestimmen, auf wen WP verzichten kann und auf wen nicht. Du bist nicht der WP-Chef. Im Ggs. zu Dir maße ich mir außerdem nicht an, Deinen Nutzen für die WP zu kommentieren. Ich will einfach nur in Ruhe gelassen werden. Also poste in Zukunft keinen Unfug mehr auf meine Seite und ich lasse Dich ebenfalls in ruh. --KAMiKAZOW (talk) 13:08, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

AfD
I went ahead and nominated this article for deletion: Articles for deletion/Alternate successions of the English crown. Kitfoxxe (talk) 13:27, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Why?
What was that for? Slow down with the reverting please. Those tools make it too easy. 75.4.146.74 (talk) 05:31, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The {} are needed.--Oneiros (talk) 13:10, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * No they're not since they're empty. They're optional in that case. The actual code used to make that image didn't have them on each one. I removed them because it screws up the syntax highlighting. 75.4.146.74 (talk) 21:25, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Also, note the version you reverted to (which has been there for awhile) also leaves out some intentionally to show it's optional. 75.4.146.74 (talk) 21:26, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Stop messing with code you don't understand. Without the {} TeX won't insert a space after the logos. Try it out for yourself.--Oneiros (talk) 13:37, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Please help me understand
Oneiros, What do you consider a "best link"? Filling PDF forms from Excel is a very common task that business users try to do. However, it is not well known at all how to actually do this. FDF plus a little VBA is the FREE answer that thousands of people are searching for. The article that you removed the external link to explains the process very clearly with sample files, and is non-commercial. That external link was this one: http://www.excelhero.com/blog/2010/04/excel-acrobat-pdf-form-filler.html Is there another location where this important information should instead be located? Regards, Xyrph (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:41, 22 March 2011 (UTC).

Tagging talk pages and templating the regulars
Hi. I reverted this edit to User talk:JWB. I'm sure you meant well but adding a tag to someone else's user or user talk page is generally frowned upon. If you feel their talk page is too long then you may simple write a note in a new section asking them to archive it. Likewise your note about edit summaries was probably sub-optimal. While there is no rule against using a template to communicate a concern we generally feel that an editor with several thousand edits under their belt deserves a little more time and attention than is mustered through uw-editsummary. Often what happens in those cases is the user receiving the template becomes upset at the template and the follow-up discussion more often involves the means of communication and not the original act. Thanks for your time. Protonk (talk) 21:18, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Please add your concerns about tagging to WP:USETEMP and Template talk:Verylongtalk.--Oneiros (talk) 21:26, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
 * No. That is a template talk page and a user warnings project page.  I do not have a problem with the template itself. Protonk (talk) 22:12, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The page you really wanted to mention is WP:DTR.--Oneiros (talk) 22:17, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok. I'm glad you have read that page.  But all I wanted to do was let you know why I reverted your edit and why it might not be in the best interests of all concerned to template an editor where a short personal note will do.  Am I making myself clear? Protonk (talk) 22:37, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes.--Oneiros (talk) 22:38, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Whoops, Thanks for That
My watchlist just erupted with all the talk page creations on the category pages, which I didn't think of. Thanks for taking care of those. I haven't created all the various class-level (B-class, Stub-Class, etc.) pages yet - what else needs to be created, or are some typically automatic once a page is placed in the category via the grading system? CycloneGU (talk) 17:05, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Don't know if there's a bot for this—the creation of a new country is a very singular event. For what's needed, check the toc at Category:Project-Class_South_Sudan_articles; quite a lot of categories are missing.--Oneiros (talk) 17:14, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I created some more; I think all the class-related ones are created now. CycloneGU (talk) 17:51, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

What does ABQ mean? CycloneGU (talk) 21:16, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Adding the Template:AbQ-Template.--Oneiros (talk) 21:19, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Regarding League of Extraordinary Gentlemen Volume III: Century Edit
Terribly sorry for the failure to detail edit reasons. Will do in the future. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jwk3 (talk • contribs) 03:58, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Talk:Jodi Rell/Archive index
Talk:Jodi Rell/Archive index, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Jodi Rell/Archive index and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Talk:Jodi Rell/Archive index during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. --Sgt. R.K. Blue (talk) 08:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/METATYPE1
Fu's response to the AfD convinced me that this article should be kept. Would you mind seeing if you agree? If not, I won't hound you to change your mind. It is your opinion after all. Joe Chill (talk) 00:08, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

About your votes
Hello. I just noticed that you opposed a lot of candidates at stewards elections without any comment (including me). I think that a vote on such elections - especially an oppose - should be thought, and not decided in a short time, on the impulse. In my case, could you at least tell me in two or three lines what's wrong with my on-wiki behaviour, or what makes you think I won't do a good job as a steward ? Only feedback allows to improve. Thanks by advance -- Quentinv57 (talk) 20:55, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Han The Thanh
Han The Thanh has been living with his wife in Bielefeld, Germany, since 2006  --94.79.135.231 (talk) 23:54, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * That doesn't make him a german citizen. And I know from reliable sources that he lived in England in 2009.--Oneiros (talk) 12:00, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Simulacron-3
I removed the tag from this article because it has been there over a year without anyone fixing the underlying lack of reference.

I have a copy of the book and I know original sources (the book itself) are not supposed to be cited. However, the article is accurate, even if it was someone's original review of the book. (And considerably better than the reviews I can find online.)

Tags are useful if they attract someone who will do something about the tag. But at some point it should be clear that nobody is going to do anything about it.

Simulacron-3 is a very important work, it influenced much of the work that came after it, including The Matrix.

Your choices are to put the article up for deletion, find cites, pull the tag, or leave the tag and let people know that after more than a year no Wiki editor cares enough to find the cites (if there are good ones).

I think tags should age out.

Keith Henson (talk) 16:27, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Message on User_talk:140.203.220.190
Oneiros, I read you comment on the talk page of 140.203.220.190. The change you reverted was Londonderry -> Derry. As there were no other changes nor comments in the summary it could very well be a simple mistake. Also it was the first edit of the user so there is no history of vandalism or "mistakes". I think 140.203.220.190 should then have the benefit of the doubt (assume good and be nice to newcomers and so). Look at it this way: if you made a first ever edit and you found the next day on your talk page a comment accusing you of vandalism. How would you take that? Cheers,Scafloc (talk) 19:50, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Badly. Thanks for the reminder. I've deleted my comment and welcomed hir.--Oneiros (talk) 20:25, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Signing posts.
Thanks for the heads up. --Rawlangs (talk) 21:33, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Talk:PostScript
You reverted a question of mine. Please read the question before saying it is vandalism !

--AXRL (talk) 00:15, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Reverted edit on "LaTeX" page
Hi Oneiros, I would like to dispute your reverted edit on the "LaTeX" page on 23:36, 16 March 2012‎. You say "Sorry, but CTAN exists and those templates should be submitted there." in response to the website www.latextemplates.com being added to the External Links section of the page.

My dispute lies with your seeming bias towards CTAN as the only resource for LaTeX. CTAN is primarily a resource for LaTeX packages and has no clear templates section. I would argue that www.latextemplates.com has a completely different mission and there is no reason that both are not valid resources for different requirements relating to LaTeX.

I believe you should reinstate this link on the External Links section of the "LaTeX" page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VelimirNZ (talk • contribs)  00:04:11, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * This discussion belongs on the talk page. But please read our rules for external links.--Oneiros (talk) 19:33, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Request of clarification.
Can I know what I did wrong? I'm not a vandal. While you flagged my edit at the pango article as vandalism. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by SmagR59R60R61 (talk • contribs) 20:07, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * You must be kidding. What's this but vandalism?--Oneiros (talk) 21:30, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Digital Visual Interface recent revert
Please see the discussion on the article's talk page and comment if necessary. —GoneIn60 (talk) 08:43, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

far furture archive 2
Don't see why it needs to be deleted; the archive page is getting long and the bot will start moving topics there eventually.  Serendi pod ous  21:15, 9 May 2012 (UTC)


 * The reason I'm trying to keep the previous archives separate from this one is because they are not the archives for this page; they are the archives for the previous pages which were merged into this one.  Serendi <sup style="color:#bb0000;">pod ous  23:25, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Edit Deleted/Modified
Hi, I just got a message from wikipedia stating that one of my edits has been deemed non-constructive and thus has been removed on the entry on Ignaz Semmelweis. I would appreciate clarification of what occurred, so that I don't repeat it in the future, however I rarely (if ever) edit pages, so it is likely that it was someone else on my IP address. 86.167.12.85 (talk) 18:54, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
 * That IP has exactly one edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ignaz_Semmelweis&diff=prev&oldid=317134264 --Oneiros (talk) 21:11, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:RichardHawleyStandingAtTheSkysEdge.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:RichardHawleyStandingAtTheSkysEdge.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:19, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks!
Hi, thanks for your welcome. I will take your suggestions into consideration. (Likeype (talk) 04:28, 27 December 2012 (UTC))

Orphaned non-free image File:Nina Hagen Band (album) backcover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Nina Hagen Band (album) backcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Oneiros (talk) 18:11, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

An RfC that you may be interested in...
As one of the previous contributors to Infobox film or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!
 * This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (t • e • c) 18:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

re: edit summary
Thanks for the note. I admit I am inconsistent with them and will try to get better. 155.213.224.59 (talk) 16:37, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your feedback
Hi! cstross here. Thanks for your helpful notes.

I will not normally edit an article relating to myself or my work; I'm aware of the potential for conflict of interest and seek to avoid it. However, in the case of the "Charles Stross" page, I noticed (a) a broken link (to a non-existent web page), and (b) an incorrect book title (the book is due for publication in 2015; the title has been changed recently, subsequent to the previous edit on the page). As I didn't have time to find and pester another wikipedia editor to fix them, I decided to apply a quick fix on this occasion only. Cstross (talk) 22:41, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the edit; I eagerly await the novel (and want to read more of the cat :).--Oneiros (talk) 00:01, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant
Why do you want to double the size of the archives on Talk:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant? -- PBS (talk) 20:36, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fame soundtrack.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Fame soundtrack.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fame soundtrack.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Fame soundtrack.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Category:Category talk:WikiProject Republic of Macedonia articles has been nominated for discussion
Category:Category talk:WikiProject Republic of Macedonia articles, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 12:13, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Day Before You Came
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Day Before You Came you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 14:40, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Day Before You Came
The article The Day Before You Came you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:The Day Before You Came for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 21:21, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Silvio Berlusconi/Archive index


Hello, Oneiros. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Archive index".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 12:23, 8 December 2019 (UTC)