User talk:Onel5969/Archive 34

Archive 34: September 2016

Ilene Prusher Revert
It seems like practically all your recent edits are reverts. It ought to be obvious to someone who's ve been around the block as long as you have, but it nevertheless seems in order to suggest some other options you might consider before reverting BLP edits for lack of/inadequate sourcing, thereby leaving the entry with inaccurate information: (1) tag "citation needed" (2) contact the editor or (3) add the source yourself. Thanks! Knowitall369 (talk) 04:39, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

09:10:52, 15 September 2016 review of submission by DMB David
Hello,

I am a bit confused about everything. Sorry!!! I have added a few references in the text [but i am not sure that it is what you meant.] A lot of articles in numerous magazines have been written on Nadia. Do you want me to insert the links of these as well? If so which section should I put it under?

Thank you so so much

isabelle

Request on 14:53:40, 18 September 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Adwayt and co
I am putting all records which i have to support the authenticity of Krishan kumar kashyap. But unfortunately it got rejected. Please help me which source of data you need to get it approved. I have sources like cutting of national newspaper of india where the article of Krishan kumar kashyap was published Article published by Bihar government(Bihar is state in India) about Mr, Krishan Kumar Kashyap Scan copy of Accolades given by government to Mr, Krishan kumar Kashyap Scan copy of article published in French journal about Mr, Krishan kumar kashyap

I dont know whether the data source which i am using is wrong or the way i am uploading/presenting to Wikipedia is wrong. I need your guidance for get it done Hopes you will help me.

Thanks

Adwayt and co (talk) 14:53, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

18:16:25, 30 September 2016 review of submission by DanSheman
Hello - My name is Jannie Wolff and I'm writing on behalf of Dan Sherman. I'm looking at this submission again and it's been a while since Dan Sherman was working with you on it and I noticed that there is a note that as it has been six months since the last edit it is eligible for deletion, so I wanted to send a quick note to let you know we are looking at it to edit it for resubmission. Any suggestions you can give at this point would be helpful for what still needs to be done. In looking at it today, it seems that there are some very good sources that Dan Sherman provided, so please let us know what else needs to be done before we resubmit.

Blessings,

Jannie