User talk:Onel5969/Preliminary review templates

Comments
"Also, minor nitpick: the "Failure to do so .. " sentence is in an odd location. It could work better as a second paragraph, starting "Failure to fix the above ... "" - from

"...Failure to do so could result in the article being sent to draft, redirected to an appropriate target, or deleted. While the subject appears notable, there are significant portions of the article which are unsourced/poorly sourced. As per WP:VERIFY, all information on WP should have have valid sourcing." The last sentence should IMO be clarified to "All material that fall under WP:BURDEN should have valid sourcing". To me, referring directly to the minimum standards for inline citations under WP:BURDEN would be helpful. Otherwise some newcomers might assume even non-controversial, non-BLP, non-quotation statements need in-line citations." - from

"Also the NBIO template IMO should link to either additional WP:NBIO criteria or at least WP:BASIC? I don't like having too many links and upper-case letters, but otherwise it's basically just the same with the GNG template with just one (albeit helpful) extra line, " Also, please remember that interviews, being primary sources, do not count towards GNG. Therefore the article does not meet WP:GNG"." - from