User talk:Onelbil

I did not intend my editing note to sound as harsh and if there were multiple editors, that helps explain the problems with grammatical narrative, redundancy and continuity.

With a sincere smile - the summary of the shows should be exactly that...summaries. Telling the opening, storyline, and outcome of shows are spoilers.This isn't my view, it is reality. The notation that the summaries are verbose is what prompted me to edit. NOTE: look at the other summaries for virtually ANY tv show (including previous seasons of this one) and they are a few simple sentences.

Southland S5 Summaries
User, I'm not sure why you're insisting on making butchering "edits" to the Season 5 Southland Episode summaries. You are incorrect about the guidelines. You don't get to just decide what you think is best and butcher the work of many other editors acting in good faith. There is a TV Style Guide that gives the guidelines for summaries. *ALL* of the season summaries are within that range. When you make a change, especial a massive change that's disputed, you are supposed to leave a comment on the article's talk page (not your own talk page.) I'm not sure if you're trying to cause trouble, because that's what it looks like, or not but it's not difficult to communicate. That's what we've been trying to do with you. Respectably, you're either trying to be disruptive or you know little about the Wikipedia editing process. I'd suggest that you communicate on the Talk page rather than trying to force your incorrect views. Wikipedia is for everyone to work together not force one's preference. ─ Matthewi (Talk) • 04:35, 3 May 2013 (UTC)