User talk:Onepiola

Welcome
Hello, Onepiola, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Miguel Mas (actor) have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 04:52, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but IMDB is not a reliable source for biographical information. Moreover, simply copying and pasting text into Wikipedia from a source like that is not in agreement with copyright requirements, and the text itself is not neutral or encyclopedic. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 04:54, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Love Equation for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Love Equation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Love Equation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JoelWhy (talk) 15:46, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Love equation
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Love equation, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://wikibin.org/articles/love-equation.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 18:26, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Love equation


A tag has been placed on Love equation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ... disco spinster   talk  21:35, 17 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi onepiola, sorry but I did go ahead and delete the article. To be included in Wikipedia an article must have not one but several different references from reliable sources, each fact in it must be sourced.  I'd be happy to give you the text to work on in your userspace (that is, any page beginning with User:/... such as User:/sandbox), and if you can find enough sources you can move the article back into the main article space (where it had been when it was deleted).  Don't hesitate to leave me a message on my talk page if you have any questions or need anything, I'm always glad to help. Peace,  delldot   &nabla;.  00:08, 18 December 2012 (UTC)