User talk:Onlinelondon

Welcome
A tag has been placed on your user page, User:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages: user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for businesses.

If you can indicate why the page is not blatant advertising, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to your user talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also edit this page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Peridon (talk) 10:50, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Abc-update-dorota.png
Thanks for uploading File:Abc-update-dorota.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:06, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

There are so many rules and regulation on Wike, that I consider taking all my account down; I would not of course upload other people's photos!!! Is that common place for the users? I am not used to lying and cheating!! The photo was taken by me in Poland and belongs to my rights, Eddy Jacobsen, www.eddy.nu

Speedy deletion nomination of Onlinelondon


A tag has been placed on Onlinelondon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. E. Fokker (talk) 20:16, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Front-garden-7.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:Front-garden-7.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. E. Fokker (talk) 20:23, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Onlinelondon


A tag has been placed on Onlinelondon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Morgan Kevin J (talk) 14:19, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Paulina-eddy-records.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Paulina-eddy-records.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:05, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Vilmar eddy hilberg-jacobsen
Hello, Vilmar eddy hilberg-jacobsen, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Articles for deletion/Vilmar eddy hilberg-jacobsen whether the article Vilmar eddy hilberg-jacobsen should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Vilmar eddy hilberg-jacobsen, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! Morgan Kevin J (talk) 17:57, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vilmar eddy hilberg-jacobsen


A tag has been placed on Vilmar eddy hilberg-jacobsen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 18:08, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

]] == Vilmar ==


 * First of all, the text is… written poorly… why all… the… ellipses? Also, there are tons of grammar errors, and the tone reads more like a fansite, with irrelevant info like what chords he learned first.
 * Don't use second person ("you may here [sic] it here"). And in general, don't link to YouTube either.
 * Also, what makes him notable? Where has he recorded albums? Has he charted anywhere? Having a lot of hits on YouTube means nothing for our notability guidelines nor our guidelines for musicians. I could find nothing on the guy online — no reliable websites, no newspaper coverage, etc.

I don't think Vilmar will ever be notable enough to have a page. Sorry, that's just the way it is. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:42, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

My music is recorded in Salvation Army studio and google my name, is all over google, it obvious that this person here cannot read, and is a psychopath who loves to tramp on other people and their achivements You find nothing on this guy online; YOU ARE A BLOODY LYING BASTARD... Grammar, so the wiki does not have grammar fault, before the owners eventually correct them; Wiki; this man is a PSYCHO, remove his comments...

www.eddy.nu

I suggest you observe COURTESY and NO PERSONAL ATTACKS. Second, start your article by explaining what makes this guy fall within our WP:NOTABILITY guidelines. If he doesnt he will surely be deleted. Third, you need numerous WP:RS to enabLe us to VERIFY. Kittybrewster  &#9742;  02:18, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

If you're not having a particularly great day...
... it's probably best to steer clear of changing other people's user-pages. If you want to make some changes, the back of the unpatrolled pages backlog is a quiet place to help out. --Shirt58 (talk) 09:17, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

November 2011
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to User:Peridon, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Sparthorse (talk) 20:51, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at User:Peridon, you may be blocked from editing. Sparthorse (talk) 21:30, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges, as you did at User:Peridon. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 21:32, 15 November 2011 (UTC)