User talk:OnlyNano/Archives/2024/July

Question from Harbans Pathania (09:18, 22 June 2024)
Hello OnlyNano, Bavan Maval is a notable article on Wikipedia and Bavan Mavals were ruled and controlled by Koli chief and all of the information was removed by a user named DeccanFlood. DeccanFlood placing the fake details of Marathas on Bavan Maval. DeccanFlood added the sources in which is written that twelve mavals were controlled by Maratha and all information is about Twelve Mavals according to given sources but DeccanFlood hijacking the Bavan Maval article and removing Koli details of Bavan Maval. I request you to block DeccanFlood for infinity and revery his edits to stop his dictatorship on wikipedia. --Harbans Pathania (talk) 09:18, 22 June 2024 (UTC) Struck sock comment. Ratnahastin (talk) 05:22, 27 June 2024 (UTC)


 * I don't have the ability to "block [him] for infinity." Have you tried dispute resolution? OnlyNanotalk 01:16, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Yes, I tried to convince him a lot but he did not listen. You should remove his edits and bring back the correct information. Harbans Pathania (talk) 04:13, 23 June 2024 (UTC) Struck sock comment. Ratnahastin  (talk) 05:22, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I just put the warning on your profile, which just has links to checkout. This is pretty much an edit war, so take a look at WP:WAR to settle the dispute. I'd only be feeding the war, then become involved myself. OnlyNanotalk 15:07, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Trinidad ISD Edit
YOU MADE THE MISTAKE TO CHANGE MY EDIT BACK BEACUSE IF YOU GO TO THE TRINIDAD ISD website, to the 2 page at the bottom, it says MICHAEL WARREN as principal and athletic director!!! Nwgregory2010 (talk) 22:50, 24 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Whether it's there or not, it's still unsourced. Copy the link where it says that, and create a   for it. OnlyNanotalk 22:54, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Gojoseon edit
Sorry. Waiting for my block to get reverted. Nbph. 74.98.189.153 (talk) 04:39, 25 June 2024 (UTC)


 * You are blocked, but editing while logged out? That's block evasion. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:36, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

tambur
Hello, I noticed that a user, who is probably one of the administrators, makes a lot of false information without sources or by citing irrelevant sources,

for example, he tries to insert something that does not exist, by inserting a page in Wikipedia, for example, something called Mocha. A Japanese drink that you made mocha Mocha is a Japanese drink that someone entered a Wikipedia page and typed "Mocha Kurdish"And hit it is the first and main form of mocha. Wikipedia place The inclusion of correct and genuine content is with reliable sources, not the place of page references without sources that create false naming on something else in it. Please look into it. We are wondering how this page was created. It looks like people can make any page with wrong content and be supported.

2A02:4540:A4:F99F:F6 75:FF87:E2C0:2633 (talk) 20:11, 25 June 2024 (UTC)


 * I am very confused about what you're saying. Could you add rephrasing and links, please? OnlyNanotalk 20:42, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 July newsletter
The third round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 June. As with Round 2, this round was competitive: each of the 16 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 256 points.

The following editors all scored more than 400 points in Round 3:


 * with 1,059 points, mostly from 1 featured article on DeLancey W. Gill, 11 good articles, 18 did you know nominations, and dozens of reviews;
 * with 673 points, mostly from 2 featured articles on Worlds (Porter Robinson album) and I'm God, 5 good articles, and 2 did you know nominations;
 * with 557 points, mostly from 1 featured article on KNXV-TV, 5 good articles, and 8 did you know nominations; and
 * with 415 points, mostly from 1 featured article on Great cuckoo-dove, with a high number of bonus points from that article.

The full scores for round 3 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 28 featured articles, 38 featured lists, 240 good articles, 92 in the news credits, and at least 285 did you know credits. They have conducted 279 featured article reviews, as well as 492 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 22 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed during Round 4, which starts on 1 July at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (,, and ) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Moana (franchise)
Deleted G6. You can proceed with accepting the draft. -- Whpq (talk) 15:50, 1 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Complete, thank you! OnlyNanotalk 16:07, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Requested edits to Perkins Eastman
Hello, I got notification that our conversation about this page was deleted and archived, otherwise I would have commented there as you suggest: Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 209

Anyway, you mentioned you'd be on the lookout for my requested edits, and I'm seeing that there are 152 edit requests ahead of me. Can you tell me what that means? Like does that mean months of waiting, or weeks? There is incorrect information on the current page that I would like to correct. I would also like to receive guidance on what edits in my request I can make now and which would go through, notwithstanding my COI. Thank you.

OH, and you said "add diffs" but I don't know how to access that. Here are my requested edits on the talk page: Talk:Perkins Eastman

Thanks in advance for your advice.

Jennifer Sergent/ Perkins Eastman Jserge630 (talk) 20:36, 1 July 2024 (UTC)


 * I added a link to what diffs are in my rules section. The time it takes to get reviewed varies. Our COI discussion is all over, so it's fine that it was archived! It's random when you will get approved, so you will just have to wait, I guess. It's same with the articles for creation process. OnlyNanotalk 01:22, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks -- so, while I'm waiting, do you think there are any basic, factual edits I can add myself to correct errors? Jserge630 (talk) 13:52, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

About the Negative Man page
I'm afraid that you made a mistake and the information I added on that page is correct.172.13.193.84 (talk) 01:12, 2 July 2024 (UTC)


 * ✅ I can see where you are coming from, and have reverted my removal of your edits. OnlyNanotalk 01:17, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

about Delta Chat draft
hi, thanks for your comment in https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Delta_Chat I am not sure if this is the proper way to reply to your comment, didn't see any other way to reply in-place

you said that "there are zero good sources that have a good reputation." I don't think that is true, Heise is a source with good reputation, also I checked similar articles like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Element_(software) and I don't see how their sources are more relevant, also there is already a Delta Chat page in the German Wikipedia https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delta_Chat

I am new in wikipedia, after reading a bit in the best practices I think the problem is that I cited too many sources that were not relevant enough or only mentioned Delta Chat together with other apps and not as the main topic of the article, I deleted those references.

Thanks for your review and comments <3 2001:16B8:A18D:C300:9C94:16EB:84A5:C1D (talk) 12:16, 2 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks for letting me know, and resubmitting. I'll take another look and verify, but I don't think I reviewed the notability of Heise. I'll keep you posted! OnlyNanotalk 13:24, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
 * ❌ I'm still going to have to decline, because it requires significant coverage on several independent and reliable sources. Heise seems like a pretty good source. But the rest are just primary sources or bad/not related sources.
 * Also, does not appear to be a source at all, since it is most likely a paid story. OnlyNanotalk 13:30, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
 * shouldn't the fact that the page already exists in the German wikipedia https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delta_Chat be proof that the article is relevant? maybe some of the sources from there could be included
 * thanks for your review and time! 2001:16B8:A18D:C300:9C94:16EB:84A5:C1D (talk) 13:58, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
 * There is better sourcing on the de article. Just because it's published in the German Wikipedia doesn't automatically mean it's notable. OnlyNanotalk 14:01, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Article on Musician Bill MacKay
Hello OnlyNano

Thank you for looking at my submission. I admit to being confused about it being turned down again, especially since yesterday's edits include a feature piece on my subject matter, musician Bill MacKay, in The Washington Post, long considered one of America's and the world's premier newspapers.

I am left wondering what sort of possible more independent coverage could be possible, other than perhaps a longer piece in the same paper.

Please advise as I think Mr. MacKay's long public career warrants his inclusion as a subject in Wikipedia.

Thank you very much and have a wonderful day.

Monica Monica Woods Writer (talk) 14:40, 2 July 2024 (UTC)


 * ❌ I've tried to rework it a bit, but too much of it is promotional. OnlyNanotalk 15:28, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I appreciate that. I replied to a Jake W who had written me, replied just now as well concerning disclosure of financial stake in the subject, of which I have none, and made that clear.
 * Please let me know if I can assist with further clarity on anything at all. I appreciate your work.
 * Monica Monica Woods Writer (talk) 16:36, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Great, simply just what I had already mentioned in comments! OnlyNanotalk 17:19, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you! I am glad to hear we are on the same page. I will work to re-edit in a more neutral tone. Monica Woods Writer (talk) 19:00, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Sounds great, thanks. OnlyNanotalk 19:35, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi OnlyNano
 * I have just done a re-working of the language. I hope & think it now hews closer to the neutral tone required for the article. Several things were simplified and opinions removed in favor of the straight facts. Thanks for your help, and letting me know how I can improve further if necessary. All the best,
 * Monica Monica Woods Writer (talk) 20:03, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Hello OnlyNano,
 * I see that the article has been turned down again, and on reviewing it I don't see the instances of advertising-based or promotional language mentioned, and I took out everything I could that appeared to offer any kind of biased view towards the subject.
 * It appears to me to read as more as an entry listing events and work produced. Am I incorrect here?
 * Can you please give me advice on how to go forward with the article? I feel the subject has merit and is worthy of inclusion. Thanks for helping me do what I can do get the article in proper shape for submission.
 * One thing that would help would be to outline for me some of the lines that are problematic.
 * Thank you so much.
 * MW Monica Woods Writer (talk) 14:07, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi OnlyNano,
 * Jake W suggested I speak to you as I'd like to ask if you could please review my submission again. I have heavily edited and shaped it, and I believe I now understand much better how to format such an article. I am thankful to you and other staff for making it clear what sort of tones are appropriate and so on.
 * In any case, I'd be grateful if you'd lend your eyes to it again, thus forgoing the months-long process of waiting to be reviewed, again.
 * Thanks for whatever you can do. All the best,
 * Monica Monica Woods Writer (talk) 17:22, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Sounds good, I'll take a look, and let you know! OnlyNanotalk 20:09, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Alright, so I think it is best to explain in more length why I still would like to make the decision to decline the article in it's current state.
 * Let's start with the sourcing. I noticed immediately an article on The Guardian. They are a great spot to have an article about a subject in. It's reliable, free, easy for AfC reviewers to see notability. Though, the article in question included on the source list,, doesn't include a single mention of Bill MacKay. The NPR source is what I can say is pretty good, at best, unfortunately. The article itself seems to be almost like a passing mention, as the article is two short paragraphs. Another article from a good source, Pitchfork, is another (definitely) passing mention. I have to reactivate my library source for the New York Times, though that is also not an article about the subject, so that's not going to be the killer source to get this article published. However, I do like the Washington Post article. It's about him! It's from a reliable publication! And, best of all... it's not a passing mention! That's a good start! Just find more articles, like the Washington Post article, and add them into the article! While it's easier said than done, if you really think this musician is notable, then you should go look for those amazing articles! You can get more information about good sourcing tips at Wikipedia's page on verifiability, and the section on sourcing, on that very same page!
 * Next, we have to talk about the promotional language. I noticed that you had been warned recently about having a conflict of interest. I understand where you are coming from with the article. I slip up loads when getting overly promotional about a great restaurant I've visited, even when talking. That's normal! I like how well you've cleaned up the article, and I don't see any glaring issues.
 * In more general terms that would beef up your article, an infobox would be amazing! Those are a pre-built template (they can be made by you, if you want, though!) which get imported into your article. I would suggest adding Template:Infobox musical artist into the article. This is not a requirement to be accepted, but I feel better about accepting an article (much like submitting your essay in a binder, rather than the pages themselves) when I see infoboxes and content.
 * So, to sum up, I would like to see more sourcing, and ideally some more content (don't forget headings, and naming sections, such as History and Discography) and an infobox. I think the sourcing should be your #1 priority, though. Let me know if you need any more help! OnlyNanotalk 20:30, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Request on 21:15:03, 2 July 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by Callummccormack
Hey thanks for reviewing my first article, first of hopefully many.

I chose Sam Brodie as my first topic as he is relatively notable in my country and believed an article could be suitable, especially giving his recent chart entry which is a criteria of notability for musicians (Billboard charts). He has also earned a gold record which is another criteria of notability for musicians.

Is this article suitable to be a stub? (Scottish musician stubs) as there is relevant sourcing and notability, but maybe we can open it up for expansion?

He is one of the bigger musicians from Scotland too, as an artist, but I couldn't find much relevant sourcing on that - maybe some other editors could look through it more in depth if we created a stub and opened it up for expansion.

Looking through 'Category:Scottish record producers' there are many with less notability and sourcing as Brodie, but are labelled as stubs or not labelled at all with similar detail.

As you say, and I agree with, "it's on the brink of being accepted" and for my first article that's some positive feedback and any more would be very helpful. I could find more sourcing and notability but I don't want to overkill the article and keep it as neutral as possible, in hopes other writers could contribute too.

Thanks, Callum.

Callummccormack (talk) 21:15, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Epic Games Store giveaways for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Epic Games Store giveaways, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/List of Epic Games Store giveaways until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Duelbits
Hello, OnlyNano. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Duelbits, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:05, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Question from OmbreDeLaMort on USS Iowa (BB-61) (00:02, 5 July 2024)
USS Iowa was not the only ship of her class deployed to the Atlantic during WWII. In fact, the USS New Jersey (BB-62), of the Iowa class was the last US Battleship deployed to the Atlantic when there was the threat of the Tirpitz breaking out. --OmbreDeLaMort (talk) 00:02, 5 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Is there some way I can be of assistance? OnlyNanotalk 21:59, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:44, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Question from TSlavik psptech (14:00, 11 July 2024)
Hello, please I have a problem to find an editing source/page. I would like to click the Edit source tab at the top of a Wikipedia page, but the button is not visible. Instead of menu: read, edit, view history, I can see just: read,view source, view history. Thank you for your kind help, Tomas --TSlavik psptech (talk) 14:00, 11 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Hey there! If you were able to post this message, you should have no problem editing. Did you try editing any other pages except the one you were looking to edit? It's possible that that page could have had page protection on it. Try clicking on this link (a link to automatically open the editor for the page Epic of Gilgamesh), and see if there's any warnings or block notices. That page has no page protection, and should be editable by you. OnlyNanotalk 14:40, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

First article
Hello, please help me with editing of the first article. I finished foundation of the user page and when entering a new page name (PSP Technologies) a message appeared: This user has publicly declared that they have a conflict of interest regarding the Wikipedia article Plasma shock peening (PSP). What can I do for edit finish please? Thank you, TSlavik psptech (talk) 13:47, 13 July 2024 (UTC)