User talk:Onlythetruthisappropriate

Feel free to leave a message

November 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Sight of You, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you. Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions.  19:35, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Warning about your editing
Hello there

I would like you to take a moment to reflect on your edits. At present you are being disruptive. You added information to Julie Carp claiming that she was leaving in 2013. You failed to cite a source, so I am well within my rights to issue a warning template. However TW is not working and I am having to explain instead. Next time you should cite a source. But from the stories I read there was no maternity leave mentioned and that means there has been some guess work. I'd also like to point out that you changed a value on Paul Lambert's article changing Johnny as Paul's husband instead of civil partner. It was a civil partnership.. Rain  the 1  00:35, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello i would first off like to apologize for this i did not intend to cause any distribution firstly with the Julie Carp incident i assumed that as the actress confirmed pregnancy and has a family she would go on maternity and secondly regarding the Paul Lambert incident in multiple soap civil partnerships have been listed at 'husbands' so i apologize but was just following these other soap --Onlythetruthisappropriate (talk) 01:16, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Onlythetruthisappropriate, you are invited to the Teahouse
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Talk That Talk, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.  Rain  the 1  21:37, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Chris Brown discography, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. — Oz  (talk)   22:32, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * All Fired Up (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to All About Tonight


 * James Arthur (singer) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Saltburn

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

December 2012
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Ren Harvieu, you may be blocked from editing.  Rain  the 1  23:08, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Labrinth with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  —Entropy (T/C) 23:18, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Reply
You will not be getting an apology from me because you added information without a source. I was correct to issue a warning because it is certainly not the first time. You have four warnings then a block may be issued if the problems persist. I just noticed that you blanked a valid warning... Here are a few things you can do to limit disruption:


 * Include edit summaries
 * Include sources
 * Stop removing sourced content without discussing it

If you can demonstrate this rather than ignore the valid warnings you have earned so far - you'll progress and improve. Which is all anyone wants. Thank you. Rain  the 1  23:24, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

When adding information use a citation - there is a list of citation layouts available at WP:CT. You have to include a source otherwise you are breaking the projects WP:OR policy. Here is a quick example - You can copy this citation and fill out the fields replacing the "value" with the relevant information. The work is field is the work cited - e.g. "Digital Spy, The Official Charts Company, The Daily Mail, Billboard, The Australian"... the publisher field is the name of the publisher "Hearst Magazines UK, Associated Newspapers, Northern & Shell, Newsquest"... the access date is todays date, the date is the date provided on the source/article, the first and last field is for the article author's first and last names and the URL is self-explanatory. Rain  the 1  23:36, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Tonywalton Talk 00:01, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Zymurgy. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Lana Del Rey, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Zymurgy (talk) 01:01, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tulisa Contostavlos with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Zymurgy (talk) 01:19, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Tulisa Contostavlos with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Zymurgy (talk) 01:22, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Tyger Drew-Honey with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mediran ( t  •  c ) 01:32, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

January 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Unorthodox Jukebox, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 18:38, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Beyoncé Knowles discography, without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — Oz  22:01, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

2012 in British music
Yes, but it had been tagged for improvement (not by me) for a long time. I hope to finish updating it today and then you can comment on the finished product. It is an uphill struggle trying to streamline it whilst trying not to undo all the hard work that has been done by others. Deb (talk) 14:08, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay, off you go. Deb (talk) 15:43, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I think it would be unwise to revert it as the result would be going against the consensus already established on the talk page, and also you'd have to replace the tag, so sooner or later someone else would come along and make similar changes. I would suggest you come up with an alternative layout. Deb (talk) 18:33, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I think you'll have difficulty doing that while sticking to British artists, unless you do a lot of additional research. Someone added all this material as it happened; however, they didn't keep track of every single throughout the month. Deb (talk) 18:38, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Would you call that "British music", though? I don't think most people would.  If you wanted to put in a week-by-week breakdown of how every British single did, then I could hardly complain.  But it seems to me that US, European, etc, music should be included only when it's notable in terms of British music (as opposed to the British charts).  For example, if a US record is at number one in the UK charts, it's probably worth mentioning.  When a US record is at number 30 in the UK charts, it definitely isn't.  At least, that's my opinion. Deb (talk) 19:18, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * There would be other factors, I suppose. For example, how long was it at number two for?  If it was there for 8 weeks, then yes.  If it was only there for one week, probably not. Was it featured in an advert on British TV?  Was the artist doing a major tour of the UK at the time?  Stuff like that.  There's no absolute right and wrong answer, but if you look at the comments on the Talk page, you'll see a vague consensus. Deb (talk) 19:25, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012 in British music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MDNA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

=Warning= This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at Nobody's Perfect (Jessie J song), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 01:31, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Jennifer Lopez, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. TBrandley (what's up) 21:19, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 06:16, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

February 2013
Please stop. Wikipedia is not censored. Any further changes which have the effect of censoring an article, such as you did to List of Hollyoaks characters, will be regarded as vandalism. If you continue in this manner, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Rain  the 1  01:19, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

March 2013
Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to What You've Done to Me, without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. 0z (talk) 03:23, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bo Bruce. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges.
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Whilst I do appreciate the work of all editors on Wikipedia, I have been forced to revert your edits to three articles (Bo Bruce, Before I Sleep (album) and Bo Bruce discography) yet again. As has been stated in other warnings on your talk page above, please do not remove properly sourced material from articles as you did here.

The midweek chart position of the album has never been referred to as anything but this and the midweeks are valid chart within the UK, operated by The Official Charts Company, so I'm unsure why you believe, as you stated in your most recent edit summary, that the "midweek does not count". I also know of no Wikipedia rules which support your reasoning for deleting this information.

In addition to this, the first time you chose to delete properly sourced material from these three articles on Wikipedia you also failed to include any edit summaries, which I notice you have been warned for previously. In regards to your most recent set of edits, I do not believe the fact that the edit "made the article look neater" to be a suitable reason to delete sourced information from any article.

If you would like to dispute this please find Wikipedia rules which support your decision to remove the material and please do so on talk pages, rather than continuously removing information from articles which is well within Wikipedia's rules and guidelines as this is disruptive to other editors.

Thank you for your time. Gracec250 (talk) 21:35, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Katy Perry discography, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. — Status  ( talk  ·  contribs ) 02:00, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Moving pages
Hi, please be careful when moving pages around. You moved Walks like Rihanna to another title and then back to Walks likeRihanna which means I had to ask an administrator to move it back to the correct title. Please do not use the move function unless you know what you're doing. Regards, -- Snow  Blizzard  13:52, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Closer to the Truth (Cher album), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ⁓ Hello  71  02:01, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=572427361 your edit] to Everybody Hurts may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:33, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=579734020 your edit] to Roaring 20s (album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:11, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 * being used in the trailer for the [Strictly Come Dancing (series11)|Strictly Come Dancing] The song also uses the rhythm and sound of "[[

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)