User talk:Onorem/Archive 7

October 5
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Hungrywolf 12:00, 5 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I've made 2 edits that reflect consensus and have no intention of reverting further. You, on the other hand, have consistently shown your willingness to edit war with how ever many reverts are needed to keep your own version of the article intact. I'll give this "warning" all the attention it deserves. --Onorem♠Dil 12:04, 5 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Please visit SoE's Forum and the Field Commander Championship Forum at http://fc.ueuo.com/Forum/ Your friend Blackbeard2k7 / Game Collector has been repeatedly kicked from those Forums for trolling. In the end he is banned from both Forums. He is despeately trying to join back the Forum through anonymous proxy servers (everything has been logged including his real IP's). He is supposedly a "Network Expert"....lol...he is only here to destroy the FC page in his fit of mad revenge.....lol...


 * Why are you NOT reverting the MAP section that is being deleted? You seem to be only bothered with my edits ! If you are a responsible editor then revert the MAP section.Hungrywolf 12:12, 5 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Responded on your talk. --Onorem♠Dil 12:14, 5 October 2007 (UTC)


 * You didnt bother to even reply on the mail I sent you. Hungrywolf 12:19, 5 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Your mail provided no proof of anything...and there was no request for any type of reply. --Onorem♠Dil 12:23, 5 October 2007 (UTC)


 * If you are a gamer, as some other Admin said, then you will appreciate why we the Field Commander community are passionate about this extremely great game. If you own a PSP, I will recomend you buy "Field Commander" Hungrywolf 12:48, 5 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure who said I was a gamer... Anyway, I'm a computer gamer and occasional console gamer, but never a handheld gamer. Thanks for the sales pitch though. --Onorem♠Dil 12:50, 5 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Lol...I dont own any shares in Sony. I just enjoy a great game. Hungrywolf 12:53, 5 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I didn't really think you'd profit from the transaction. I just thought it was kind of funny the way it pretty much came out of nowhere. I don't doubt that the game is great. It seems like the type of game I'd enjoy. I'm just not really on the move that much, so I don't see a reason for a portable system. --Onorem♠Dil 13:02, 5 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't move around too much too but its convenient to have a PSP when you can't access a PC. If you enjoy strategy games on the PC then I would recommend the "Total War" series.  Unfortunately to run that game in all its glory, you need a very high end PC and graphics card. Hungrywolf 13:10, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

<--(Unindent) - Well, I'm planning on buying a very high end PC and graphics card in about a month. Maybe I'll look into it. Thanks for the recommendation. --Onorem♠Dil 13:17, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism Warning Reply
On recent changes patrol, one often goes rather fast and mistakes are common unfortunately. From what I saw, this IP undid a revision by a Bot which signed an unsigned comment, and that is usually considered vandalism by some people. It appears you looked into the situation deeper than I did. :-)  Lra drama 16:53, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

St George Christian School
People keep on putting up propaganda for the corrupt principle, on this article, and destroying it to help themselves. Stop them now!

P.S.- what part of Minnasota do you live? --Adanesne 06:55, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Issues at St George Christian School
(Adanesne is back in a new form!- WooHoo, YeeHah) Issue 1: I am getting annoyed with the unfair management and don't know what to do. Issue 2: The management from that school are always putting propaganda in the local newspaper. Also I think Loopla is in cahootz with honor. Can you please block Loopla.

Regards, --Adneicah 06:49, 12 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The management at the school has nothing to do with Wikipedia, and information about them doesn't belong here without a reliable source.
 * There's been nothing unfair about the way things have gone for you, and nobody is in "cahootz" with anybody. The information you added was unsourced and correctly removed. The continued personal attacks rightfully earned you an indefinite block.
 * Wikipedia is not a soapbox. --Onorem♠Dil 11:11, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

I need some ideas to add to the Carlton Public School Article
I want to add things like more info, facts. Do you have any ideas of what things I can put up?

Many thanks in advance! --Sasayama 11:12, 15 October 2007 (UTC)


 * In addition to general information, many school articles have sections on special programs, sports and notable alumni. Remember that everything you add needs to be verified with a reliable source.  --Onorem♠Dil 11:22, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

My edits to the Carlton Public School Article:
I got a message from another user saying that the info. was copyrighted, I tryed to put it into my own words, but I am not sure if it is ok? Can you check it for me and fix up the parts that need it.

--Sasayama 08:25, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Re: Carlton P.S.
Thanks a lot for what you did, it was a big help, I appriciate the 'tidying up' you did, it's worked wonders!

Thanks a lot my friend!,

--Sasayama 07:20, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Randy Johnson
I first heard Johnson call that pitch "Mr. Snappy" in a TV ad. I've heard commentator Steve Stone call it by that name. There are many internet references, and the one from The Sporting News columnist seemed like a good one to use. I just wish I could recall what TV ad Johnson was in. Meanwhile, his pitching is not so snappy anymore, at his age. Glory is fleeting. d:) Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 13:20, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Still an impressive run though. I thought he was just about done back in 2003. --Onorem♠Dil 13:24, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes. A great pitcher. The D-Backs may wish they had him this coming week. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 13:41, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Incorrect revert
The problem seems to be with VP, which I was using to patrol for vandalism. On three separate occasions last night, it reverted the next-to-last editor on the diffs page, rather than the last one, then posted warnings on the wrong user's page as well. Not sure if this is a bug in VP, something odd in my setup, or some kind of transient. I'll track it down. In any event, I apologize for the hassle. Cmichael 17:18, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
 * No hassle for me at all. I occasionally check recent changes filtered for anonymous edits to user space. I moved the message left by the IP, but am otherwise uninvolved. --Onorem♠Dil 17:20, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Page blanking
Hi there, thanks for that info. Good anti-vandalism work lately, well done! Thebestkiano 15:40, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

 * Anytime. Thanks for the star. --Onorem♠Dil 15:59, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

HI there
Thanks very much for getting in touch with me - I am tryiong to get the hang of the code and making changes - there's a lot to take in at first sight.

I really appreciate you offer of help

All the best

Sierputowska 15:28, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Legal Branch
I wasn't sure which word to use...I agree with some of what you said on the council page, any other comments...please let me know! Thank you --Greenwood1010 12:36, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

On the thing about being a legal branch
We're not doing that anymore. Now we're just a normal project with no heiarchy whatsoever. Best, --Gp75motorsports 14:43, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
 * It's still completely redundant with several other groups, and no specific purpose for this new group has been presented. --Onorem♠Dil 14:45, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi, this is a comment that I made
This is a comment that i made in response to yours on the WikiProject/Council page When making several statments that I made I was not sure how to word the group, therefore I referred to it as a leagl branch of wikipedia. However it was indeed a simple misunderstanding. What I meant to say was a Wiki Project group. I have since changes the term legal to the term Wiki Project group. It seems the the above two gentelman / ladies (sorry, I not sure of your genders) are trying to take my mistake of wording it as a legal branch and try and make it look like we (myself and Gp75motorsports) are trying to do something wrong--Greenwood1010 15:08, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Secondly, there are indeed a few other groups that are similar to ours. So why the need for our group? A good question, heres why...In real life there are many groups that basicly do the same thing, charities are a great example, however different groups appeal to diiferent people. To many the cuurent establsihed groups are not very appeling, there fore having a new "fresh" group will drawl in more people, therefore bringing in more members to the larger "anti-vandelism" community. What I am saying is this, that to say "This One Group is the only Anti-Vandelism group allowed on Wiki" will only turn numerous wikipedians away from wanting to join, however having a small varity will drawl in more wikipedians who will "hunt down" vandels...just my thoughts. Founder of this group --Greenwood1010 15:13, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

You're getting through.
All those links you sent us, I read all the pages and reformatted ours accordingly. --Gp75motorsports 16:18, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

What we have here...
I'm kind of at a loss here with that Wikiproject; it's all a little bit like a scene from Cool Hand Luke. I feel as though I'm not getting through.--Isotope23 talk 14:55, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
 * ...so who gets to spend a night in the box? --Onorem♠Dil 16:04, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Good question... and who is going to their dirt out of my ditch?--Isotope23 talk 17:01, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

wot
da fuck? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.107.36.188 (talk) 15:35, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Is there a question or comment there somewhere? --Onorem♠Dil 15:39, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for spotting and reverting vandalism on my user page. :) &mdash;ZeroOne ( talk / @ ) 16:52, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Jake Gyllenhaal
I am not sure this is going to work, however I am replying to the message that was sent to me.

Firstly, I am threatened with some kind of three-edits-in-24-hours-rule, well, instead of threatening me, why don't you stop the person who is reversing my edits?

2) There is pertinent valuable information missing from the Jake Gyllenhaal Wiki page, and I am adding it.  Isn't Wiki supposed to be informative?  An on-line source of info?  well, that is what I am adding, information that is helpful to a person researching the actor Jake Gyllenhaal.

3) It appears that there are two people who want to suppress this information, I have no idea why this is.  I had a discussion with one of the people, she was not reasonable, so I have abandoned that avenue.

4) If I have to wait 24 hours to add the links, then I'll wait 24 hours to do that.  Can you please ask those two people why they are so hellbent on suppressing meaningful information?

5) Please take a look at the number of external links on the Jon Stewart page.  There must be at least 14 links there, so  why is there a problem with the Gyllenhaal Wiki page having 5 links? 72.39.127.157  —Preceding comment was added at 03:52, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Kia Bongo page move
Hi, I moved the Kia Bongo page. Did I do something wrong? Phasmatisnox 11:33, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks- I didn't know that option existed. What do I need to do to fix what I did? Phasmatisnox 11:34, 22 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Just have to wait for them to delete the new page. Once they've done that, you can move the old one. --Onorem♠Dil 11:35, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Please don't undo my edits!
I wrote those three albums and I have deleted tons of incorrect information. Do you even own any of my three albums to see that those credits didn't match the credits written on the albums??? Look I didn't realize until now that I was supposed to write a quick summary to explain my edits but I did it to DELETE INCORRECT CREDITS TO MY OWN ALBUM! Now will you please remove your undo to my edits???????????????????? I would like to know where all of the tons of incorrect credit info. came from in the first place. Someone should have been able to easily type it in from the very clear and detailed credits written on the albums, yet someone switched the credits and credited the wrong people on the wrong albums. —Preceding unsigned comment added by H88569 (talk • contribs) 12:45, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * In addition to the link, you also removed the categories. Were those wrong too? In regards to whether or not the information in the article is correct, "verifiability, not truth" is the policy. We have what appears to be a reliable source being used to reference the article. If you want to change that, you should either prove that it is not a reliable source, or provide another source which has the correct information. --Onorem♠Dil 13:10, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Survey:
I am going to conduct a survey, and going to use the results for an article on here. I would like you to answer the questions for me if you can. Please tell me if you can by leaving a response on here.

Thanks!

--58.105.129.249 04:50, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
 * May I ask how you decided to ask me? Depending on what type of questions you want to ask, I might be able to provide a few answers...
 * ...but unless I'm missing something, that sounds like original research, and it wouldn't be an appropriate method of collecting information for an article on Wikipedia. --Onorem♠Dil 11:02, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia Users' Alliance
Please note: this message is being sent out to all involved parties. Dear Friend, the Wikipedia Users’ Alliance has been deleted. I am sure that perhaps you already knew this. I myself just found out. Anyhow during the debate many mean and rude things where said. I am not innocent myself; I too contributed to the unpleasantness. But now Wikipedia Users’ Alliance is dead, gone forever. But we all must move on, for me and my friends, we have to deal with this loss. However it is important that all of us work together to fight vandalism and not argue with one another. There are many things that I want to say, but I know that they would only add to the mean sprit that fills the “air”. As a Buddhist (Risshō Kōsei Kai) I was reading the Holy Dhammapada yesterday. I came across this line, “Holding onto anger is like holding on to a hot coal with the intent to throw it at someone, in the end you are the one who gets burned,” how true! Lets us progress forward. WUA Founder User: King of Nepal has expressed similar views such as these to me via e-mail. His majesty said, “We have to move on, move forward. It is in the best interest of Wikipedia and us all.” I agree and hope that you do to. Thanks. --Greenwood1010 13:03, 23 October 2007 (UTC) Co-founder of the WUA. If you feel that you recived this message in error please let me know. Feel free to responed on my page if you wish.

My userpage
Thanks for reverting vandalism on it. I really appreciate it. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:04, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Parody Blogs
I reviewed the external links rules and I have to say I disagree that these pages should not be included. The parody blogs seek to be informative, relevant and provide news about their characters in an entertaining format.

In fact rule number 4 "What should be linked" gives a good justification for the inclusion of these links:


 * 1) Sites with other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article, such as reviews and interviews.

I hope you checked out these pages to see the quality of content they provide. In fact, these parody blogs aggregate news about their characters, which isn't available easily on the web. Please tell me where these links could be included if not on the external links. Thank you kindly.

--Rhombusface —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhombusface (talk • contribs) 23:45, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I disagree, and I think you should start a discussion on the talk page of each article that you want to place them on. --Onorem♠Dil 11:48, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Interesting Things!
I know that you are v. interested, so stop being a fool for once and let yourself go!

--Okayama 11:43, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * No. I'm definitely positive about not being interested. --Onorem♠Dil 11:45, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Interesting Things! Part 2
What do you mean about being interested? --Okayama 11:51, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * If you are not contacting me to help with an article, please do not contact me. I'm not going to be answering any of your stupid questions, and I'm not interested in seeing them at all. --Onorem♠Dil 11:55, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Interesting Things! Part 3
Yeah, but before you said that you were not interested!, what did you mean by that? I am starting to get scared by your comments and that your not explaining what they mean.

This IS about an article!

and NO! i'm not rested! --Okayama 12:00, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Stop removing previous comments when you write new comments. The context of the discussion is lost when you do that.
 * My underwear and gender are about an article? Sorry, but I have a feeling that article would be speedily deleted and I'm not going to waste my time helping with that.
 * If you have an actual question about a legitimate article, ask it. --Onorem♠Dil 12:03, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Interesting Things! Part 4
fuck off --Okayama 12:05, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Not interested. --Onorem♠Dil 12:06, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

I'm back!
Yeah, as the title said, i'm back and pissed off. If you send me any more threatening messages again, like you did before, I will give your employer a little call on the telephone, telling them that you are slacking off and using their computers for purposes other than work. I know where you are and what you do, so if I were you I would be watching yourself very carefully.

Carpe Diem

Regards, --Okayama 11:50, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Not interested. --Onorem♠Dil 11:52, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Your edits to User talk:170.65.188.1
Hi. I would recommend that you protect the page (if you have the power to do so) because that IP will continue to change my comment and won't stop 'till he gets enough. - Go od  sh oped 02:54, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * It's only been changed twice. That doesn't suggest to me that they "won't stop 'till he gets enough."
 * Also, I don't have the power to protect. --Onorem♠Dil 02:56, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Hehe...OK, now 3 times. That didn't take long. I still don't have the power to protect though...and vandalizing their own page will likely get old for them soon enough. --Onorem♠Dil 02:57, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually, you do. You're an admin, right? Because of the deletes you did? - Go od  sh oped 02:59, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Don't do it anymore. You're one more away from WP:3RR. Let him do his work. I'll take over. - Go od  sh oped 03:00, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Nope. I'm not an admin. Not sure which deletes you're talking about.
 * Side note...I don't think your comment to the IP talk was all that necessary. WP:DENY is generally a good rule to live by.
 * 3RR doesn't apply to blatant vandalism...which is what the IP is doing when he changes comments left by other editors. I'm in no danger of being blocked. --Onorem♠Dil 03:02, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The page has now been protected. No need for either of us to do anymore reverting tonight. --Onorem♠Dil 03:04, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, but he may wreak havoc when he gets unblocked in 2 hours. - Go od  sh oped 03:09, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

And I will. (But on a lesser scale.) Homestar1936 02:13, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I feel like blatantly violating WP:CIVIL tonight, but I won't. Enjoy your block. Please drop by again soon. When you vandalize my userspace, it's very easy to notice. :) --Onorem♠Dil 02:18, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting the vandal on my page. Cheers ForeverDEAD 02:11, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Anytime. Thanks for obviously doing something well enough to anger the vandals. --Onorem♠Dil 02:19, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Onorem page vandalism
The Myfans section of your user page seems to have been vandalized.-- Mumia-w-18 02:49, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
 * It was vandalized earlier, but I've reverted it. Thank you for the note. --Onorem♠Dil 02:53, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Re: User:Onorem
Do you need your user page to be semi-protected as allowed per the protection policy? nat Alo! Salut! Sunt eu, un haiduc?!?! 16:39, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * No thanks. I don't mind my user space being vandalized. It's easy enough to detect and revert, and anything that keeps the vandals away from the real articles is a good thing. --Onorem♠Dil 16:42, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

A quick note
I'm leaving wikipedia. See my talk page for details. ThebestkianoTundefinedC 22:05, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!!
Just a quick note to say thanks for fixing my user profile! Some friends up country found me and appear to have edited my page for there fun. Thanks again :) Burklert 10:05, 1 November 2007 (UTC)