User talk:Ontherecord27

March 2014
Hello, I'm GB fan. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Liz Wahl without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! GB fan 21:44, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Edit war
You've started an edit war at Liz Wahl article. This shouldn't be done. If you think something should be removed please discuss it at the article's talk page. Le Grand Bleu (talk) 11:35, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

April 2014
Your recent editing history at Liz Wahl shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. GB fan 11:46, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Liz Wahl. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. GB fan 14:34, 1 April 2014 (UTC)