User talk:Ontheworldtop

Welcome!
Hello, Ontheworldtop, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Eliah Drinkwitz did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Dirkbb (talk) 19:54, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

February 2022
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Larry Drew II. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 15:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Larry Drew II. —Bagumba (talk) 17:36, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

The article I cited in the footnotes contains published, public information, of which a summary appeared on my edit on the wikipedia entry. Since there are other pieces of information related to his departure from UNC, additional context is valuable no? How is that a violation of original research? It is all contained in the published news article.