User talk:Ontopofcosts

Reply
Hi, I've placed a speedy delete tag on the 3rd one, but the first and the second seem to have some basis in fact. I have placed appropriate tags for cleanup and pov on those articles. -- vi5in [talk] 00:26, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

stop POV pushing
stop adding anti pakistan sentiments and your POV will not be tolerated every time you add i will remove Algebraic123 (talk) 13:52, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Original Research
where is the original research then ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Algebraic123 (talk • contribs) 19:47, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

I am going to say this once.
Stop edit warring. Further edit warring may result in you being blocked without further notice. If there is a dispute, use the talk page. Inferno,  Lord of   Penguins  20:13, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Also, you mentioned using the talk page and dispute resolution on algebraic's talk page. Take your own advice. Inferno,   Lord of   Penguins  20:20, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * He hasnt used anything hes ignoring everything i said Algebraic123 (talk) 20:25, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

You are blocked
I blocked you for 48 hours for edit-warring on Kashmir conflict article. You can contest this block by using

Clarification of my meaning follows: Most removal of cited text is removed as part of a content dispute or due to editorial judgement. Content disputes are specifically not vandalism. Vandalism is something designed to damage the project not misplaced edits as part of a newbies learning the project or poor editorial judgement. The exemption from 3RR for vandalism is to do with stuff like reverting page blanking or reverting someone from keeping adding the word poop etc. Spartaz Humbug! 21:53, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

For when your block expires
I started a discussion about your edit here. When your block has expired please join the discussion. Thanks, and happy 09'! Inferno,  Lord of   Penguins  20:59, 1 January 2009 (UTC)