User talk:Onyxqk

Your submission at Articles for creation
Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia&. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. Jarkeld (talk) 14:37, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and declined; it is now located at Wikipedia&. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! → ♠ Gƒoley ↔ Four ♣ ← 00:05, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and declined; it is now located at Wikipedia&. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Alpha Quadrant   talk    02:28, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and declined; it is now located at Wikipedia&. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Jarkeld (talk) 02:18, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and declined; it is now located at Wikipedia&. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Alpha Quadrant   talk    05:05, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and declined; it is now located at Wikipedia&. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ~ Matthewrbowker  Say hi! 19:12, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

USN&WR rankings in lead of University of Alabama
I've posted a note about your recent edits to University of Alabama in the article's Talk page. Please stop by and respond when you have a chance. Thanks! ElKevbo (talk) 04:27, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Association of Internet Users


A tag has been placed on Association of Internet Users requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Largoplazo (talk) 17:01, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

"Parsley Elementary" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Parsley_Elementary&redirect=no Parsley Elementary] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 21:16, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Hybrid (biology) into Hybridity. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Quick note on counties
Hey there! Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, I do have a concern about your recent edits to county pages. "___ County is a county" seems incredibly redundant, and linking to a generic page about counties on every county page isn't something we usually do, nor does it seem necessary. I would love to hear your thoughts on this, though! Bsoyka (t &bull; c &bull; g) 02:26, 9 June 2024 (UTC)


 * A large majority of county pages appear to follow a variation of the "___ County is a county" format, only a subset of counties for each state seem to not use that format. I standardized county pages that didn't follow the most common format to follow that format, but did not modify county pages that were using a different format but still included a county link in the opening sentences. For instance, some counties have the link to 'county' in the second sentence rather than the first. For those pages, I did not make any modifications. Onyxqk (talk) 02:33, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Oh, interesting. I stand corrected then, my apologies. When I searched for a couple of counties I didn't see that earlier, but now I see where you're coming from. Still seems really redundant to me, but consensus is consensus! Sorry to bother—happy editing. Bsoyka  (t &bull; c &bull; g) 02:36, 9 June 2024 (UTC)