User talk:Oogala

January 2024
Hello, I'm Nath1991. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to David Brock have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Nath1991 (talk) 02:22, 19 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Dear Nath1991,
 * I pointed out that David Brock "switched sides" politically aftering coming out as a homosexual. These are absolute facts. Who are you to decide what "appears constructive", boy? I think that you are a leftist subhuman engaging in censorship, just like your kind always does.
 * I'll be back. Oogala (talk) 02:30, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

February 2024
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Joe Kent. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Panian513 03:31, 1 February 2024 (UTC)


 * To Panian513,
 * "Neutral point of view"??? On the contrary, almost all Wiki articles dealing with any political topic are commentaries, points of view & personal analysis by the author-invariably an ultra-biased left-wing extremist. The current Wiki article on Joe Kent is a fine example.
 * "Kent made false claims that the 2020 presidential election was stolen from Donald Trump a focus of his 2022 campaign."
 * False claims???? Since when has it been proven that the 2020 election theft claims are false? Yet the article asserts an OPINION as if it is a fact. I am a PhD in mathematics, are you? Benford's law is a statistical law that has used to detect voter fraud around the world for decades. Have you ever seen a Benford's statistical law analysis of the votes cast in the 2020 U.S. Presidential election? I have, & it supports the proposition that voter fraud occurred in the election with high confidence. Look it up. Not to mention the other mountain of evidence of voter fraud, none of which will make its way onto Wikipedia, of course.
 * "He labeled the perpetrators of the January 6 United States Capitol attack as "political prisoners" and spoke at a rally in defense of them organized by his top adviser."
 * "Capitol Attack"? You mean the attack upon the peaceful American citizens protesting an obviously stolen election? The very title of the wiki article is biased. I guess that you aren't following the news in which the official story is unraveling. How many of the "attackers" were ANTIFA wearing MAGA caps? How many were FBI? Did you see the Congressional hearings where Mr. Wray was asked this question & he refused to answer? Or is that "fake-news", even though you can see it on YouTube (until they remove it too). The Congressional committee has already erased thousands of hours of video to hide their phony version of reality & the U.S. government's involvement. Care to do some searches the internet to verify this? Care to write an article on Americans in prison who are arrested just for being at the Capitol on January 6th?
 * I could go on and on. It is YOU who are not here to build an encyclopedia. You engage in propaganda in "formal tones".You are all insane Left-wing extremists supported by corporations who want to create monopolies in every economic niche and use government-crazy idiots like yourself to achieve it.
 * I'll be editing all over Wiki using a VPN from now on.
 * Thanks! Oogala (talk) 04:31, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:11, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:32, 9 February 2024 (UTC)