User talk:Oojamaflipper

to the user lexein - sorry for being abrupt, but this is most annoying. you only linked reviews that are overwhelmingly negative and none of which pointed out the lies, flaws and dangerous liable that the film is soaked in. i tried to add one VERY important review, by alexa obrien. you not only deleted my entries but did not retain the obrien article. write it in there yourself if you want. but dont make out like this entry is unbias.it is not. at all.

and you did include bias in your own editorial as well..it wasnt just the terrible, establishment-stroking reviews.

this film is a menace to investigative journalism, to whistleblowers and to WL, Assange & Manning. if you are not being paid to manipulate this entry, and are doing it off your own back, with no vested interest, then you really are terribly misinformed. but i dont think you're ignorant of the real problems with this film, or with the bias in your entry, i think you are well aware. which makes it worse. hence the abruptness. this isn't about a wikipedia entry, this is about truth, justice & integrity.

PS ive never tried to edit wiki before, and didnt know how to use 'talk'. dont know how to do proper insertions like you did.. so please, take my suggestions and update the WSS page yourself, if you cant bare to have someone else do it. im happy to let you know exactly what is wrong with it and what needs to be added.


 * Having never before contributed to the article, I had reverted to the last sourced version which existed before your series of edits. Please review WP:NPA. What is not helpful in civil discussion, is your calling Lexein a nasty name by writing "stop being a cunt". Read WP:WAR. What is entirely inappropriate is in a fit of pique to delete sourced content from the article and replace the content with rants toward another editor. Read WP:VANDAL. That is NOT how we do it here. When two editors disagree, they begin as calm a discussion as possible, or seek a neutral third party to intercede. If you feel the article is negatively slanted per WP:NPOV, go to the article's talk page and discuss. Seek a compromise. If most reliable sources give criticism of the film, it IS proper to note an overwhelming poor acceptance by those critics, even if you feel it is too much negativity. WP:NPOV means we do not offer our personal opinions, but simply report what was written by others elsewhere.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 07:53, 2 June 2013 (UTC)