User talk:Oonaphi

Benjy Bronk
Hi, I see we're in danger if getting into an edit war over Benjy Bronk's age. See the comment I've made on the article talk page - the only source I can find is the IMDB one. I tried to find the NY Post article, but could not find it in their archive. I'd be grateful if you could find a reliable source that we can verify, but it's probably best not to delete the IMDB reference. It may be that the main article page should acknowledge the disagreement rather than asserting an age - what do you think? Canthusus (talk) 07:13, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi Benjy, it's so awesome to have an interaction with you right here on wikipedia! It's great. Keep up the good work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.137.138.20 (talk) 01:32, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Benjy Bronk. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Owen&times; &#9742;  20:39, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

''OwenX, please note the material that Rockypedia continues to put up is libelous, misleading and a violation of Wikipedia policy. Therefore, I believe my removal of it is not vandalism, but a constructive edit. Thank You Oonaphi (talk) 14:08, 23 November 2010 (UTC''
 * Please take the issue to the BLP noticeboard. Your continued edit war on the article page will only end with you being blocked from editing. Owen&times; &#9742;  15:10, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * For the record, the material was not 'put up' by me - I was restoring accurate, cited info that was removed by you and your apparent sock-puppet Archhow. I even tried to re-word the original paragraph in order to make it more impartial and factual, as opposed to slanted in a negative way.  Removing cited material for no reason is vandalism, plain and simple.  You can claim that it is "libelous" or "misleading" or "a violation of Wikipedia policy" but just saying that doesn't make it true, and it definitely isn't true in this case.Rockypedia (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

__NOINDEX__