User talk:Oops daisy

Welcome!

Hello, Oops daisy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Public Accounts Committee (India)
The data you added to the article Public Accounts Committee (India) was extracted from http://news.in.msn.com/business/article.aspx?cp-documentid=4641171, which is an MSN owned page and the copyright of which is held by Microsoft Corporation. It is obvious (and you have so stated) that this was moved from the article Radia tapes controversy. Your edit was obviously in good faith. But it happens that the article Public Accounts Committee (India) is a closely monitored one due to previous copyright violations. The artice was previously deleted three times for the same problem, and if this copyrighted data remains it will invite the same fate again. What you may do here is to try to type in the same information in your own words. Thanks. Austria156 (talk) 14:53, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

April 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Suresh Kalmadi with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Qwyrxian (talk) 14:10, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

The above was entirely my mistake--I did miss your explanation. It looked very odd when I saw it, but now that I look more carefully, I see that your edit was not only not damaging, it was explained and appears to be correct (without me actually going and looking at the source). My apologies--I wasn't careful enough when I examined your edit. Qwyrxian (talk) 21:14, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Thankyou
Thanks - you were correct. The source used a different name, and the section was a copyright violation. So I've removed it for now, and I'll keep an eye on it. Thankyou for pointing it out. :) - Bilby (talk) 19:24, 5 May 2011 (UTC)