User talk:Oozav

Welcome!
Hello, Oozav, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:11, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello Oozav!
Hello Oozav :) Looking forward to working with you and our other group members (D3ini and Kp23)on revising the page for transgender voice therapy! Ajtrainor (talk) 18:29, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Feedback on Transgender article!
Hi Omar, I have just done my edit of your sections for the transgender voice page - looks great! I just had a few questions/suggestions...

1. In the first paragraph, it seemskind of choppy, I wonder if integrate the last two sentences might help it flow better (e.g. transsexual women trying to feminize their voice represent the largest gender non-conforming group seeking speech therapy services, therefore, most studies regarding transgender voice focus on vocal feminization, as opposed to vocal masculinization. 2. Also, the terminology used: cisgender, pitch, Hz, etc. - are they defined earlier in the article? If they are, great! If not, you might want to provide a quick definition for clarity. One more terminology note: are you using transsexual and transgender interchangeably or are they meant to refer to different people? Just a curiosity question and it may be helpful to define! (again, I am not sure if they are defined earlier on). 3. You give an example of a technique to shift resonance and I was unsure if this is necessary if there is another section of the article that will cover techniques. If not, I think that the example is great! But if there will be a techniques section, it may be repetitive to include here :).

Hope these suggestions are helpful and great job again! Nancy Zee (talk) 21:04, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Hey Ali (I think),

Thank you so much for you input! I agree the first paragraph is choppy, and your suggestions will help it flow better. The terminology will be linked to other wikipedia articles or defined earlier. Thanks for reminding me. The techniques may not stay in my section, but we haven't decided yet.

Thanks again! Your feedback is very helpful. Oozav (talk) 00:07, 7 November 2016 (UTC)