User talk:Opdcanlb7/resigarodraftaritcle

Hi Opdcanlb7! I have just finished my peer review of the article on the Resígaro language. I think you wrote your lead well and formatted it nicely. Your information is relevant, concise, and unbiased. I also think you maintained an informative and encyclopedic tone in your lead, which was great. I have a few points for improvement, however. First, I would like to see you add some links within your lead, such as a link to "Peru" or "Arawaken language." This is helpful for the reader who may want more information on the information you are discussing. Additionally, this is a very minor issue but the correct spelling of the language is "Resígaro" with an accent mark. You exclude the accent mark in your lead, which again is minor but also important. There are also a couple of grammar mistakes I found as well as incorrectly formatted references, so just make sure you are double checking those. Other than that, great job overall, and good luck on the rest of the project!

Final Review
Hi Nicole, this is my feedback for your final project. As a reminder, the 6 points on which I'm grading you are Language, Structure, Balance, Accuracy, Relevance, and Length. Here are my assessments on each of those areas:


 * 1) Language: On the whole, the article employs proper English spelling and grammar. 5 points.
 * 2) Structure: The structure is a bit idiosyncratic and does not follow the suggested template. 3 points.
 * 3) Balance: At present, the article appears to reflect a neutral point of view. 5 points.
 * 4) Accuracy: Most of the claims are furnished with citations, and most of the citations derive from four scholarly sources. 5 points.
 * 5) Relevance: Not all of information is relevant, and much is a mixture of historical and ethnographic information with little bearing on the language itself. 3 points.
 * 6) Length: Word count 1586/2000 (including headers but not bibliography). 4 points.

The final score is 25/30. Have a great summer! Chuck Haberl (talk) 21:34, 11 May 2021 (UTC)