User talk:Open Source 2.0

Welcome!
Hello, Open Source 2.0, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as BoBoiBoy (character), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! &mdash;  Masum Ibn Musa  Conversation 12:19, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Talkback
Hello! May I discuss your pages I had been made such as BoBoiBoy (character) please vote me. Open Source 2.0 (talk) 13:58, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of BoBoiBoy (character)


A tag has been placed on BoBoiBoy (character) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://boboiboy.wikia.com/wiki/BoBoiBoy_(Character). For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Davey 2010 Talk 13:35, 10 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi Open Source 2.0. I have declined the above nomination by (whose patrolling is greatly appreciated!), even though the page is what I would term "fancruft", and its content needs lots of work to make it resemble an encyclopedia article, if suitable for inclusion at all. In this case, the source you ripped the content from is licensed under a suitably-free copyright license for use here, though I say ripped because it requires that you provide attribution to its authors, and disclose the license, neither of which you did. I am taking care of that serious problem. The fact that the content is not subject to CSD G12 in no way relieves you of the obligation to comply with copyright. Do not do this again. We take copyright obligations very seriously here. You will see that I have added edit summaries providing copyright attribution to the copyleft licensed source, and added a fully filled out  template to the references.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 17:27, 10 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Ah sorry about that I had no idea about the Wikia licence nor did I have any idea it was even related to Jimmy, I just obviously assumed it was all copyrighted etc etc so thanks for declining it, Thanks. – Davey 2010 Talk 17:47, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Scare factor


A tag has been placed on Scare factor, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Yinta n  04:49, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. I had now my histories. Open Source 2.0 (talk) 04:56, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Declining CSD. Here's now my other article. Open Source 2.0 (talk) 04:57, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Scare factor (ClosingLogos) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scare factor (ClosingLogos) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Scare factor (ClosingLogos) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Yinta n  09:34, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Why would you add a welcome message to someone with over 150,000 edits?
That makes no sense. And you also added one for a dummy account of another experienced editor. Doug Weller talk 12:40, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. CherylHew ✽ ✉  23:52, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Other wiki's content
Hey, just letting you know why the page was deleted.

Ultimately this was something that one group of people came up with one day, probably just to have a bit of fun. While the idea as a concept exists, something does not become automatically notable because it exists. (WP:ITEXISTS) I also saw a discussion here where you told that the Wikia administrator would be adding Closing Logos to Wikipedia. I couldn't tell if you were saying that you wanted to host Closing Logo wikia content on Wikipedia or if you were going to try to add more general content from the wikia to Wikipedia. Either way, neither of those things belong on Wikipedia for a few reasons. The first is that Wikipedia should not be used in the same way that you use a wikia, meaning that you shouldn't try to add every entry from say, the Closing Logos entry. The second reason is that all entries must pass notability guidelines and I don't see where Closing Logos is notable enough to be mentioned on Wikipedia. Notability is something that must be taken into consideration when you create any article and you need to make sure that something passes WP:GNG, even if you personally think that it should have an article. I also need to mention that something is not automatically notable because it is associated with notable topics. For example, a TV show is notable but this doesn't mean that every single character or monster on that show is independently notable.

I get the impression that you might be very young, so I would highly recommend that you read over WP:YOUNG and try to consult the WP:TEAHOUSE to see if a specific edit or article is appropriate for Wikipedia. Also, please do not put template messages on someone's page until you are fully aware of what that template means and how - and when - it should be used. You placed welcome templates on users' pages, at least one of which was on the page of an experienced Wikipedia editor, which gave off the impression that you weren't familiar with how they should be used.

Even if you mean well, stuff like this (creating article for non-notable topics, adding templates incorrectly) can be seen as a bit disruptive. Please be careful and make sure that you use the Teahouse! Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:41, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Don LaFontaine. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. CherylHew ✽ ✉  04:44, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Abuse of multiple accounts / IP addresses / editing while logged out
It has been found that you have been using one or more accounts abusively or have edited logged out to avoid scrutiny. Please review the policy on acceptable alternate accounts. In short, alternate accounts or people to support you should not be used for the purposes of deceiving others into seeing more support for your position. It is not acceptable to use two accounts on the same article, or the same topic area, unless they are publicly and plainly disclosed on both your and the other account's userpage.

Your other account(s) have been blocked indefinitely. This is your only warning. If you repeat this behaviour you will blocked from editing without further notice. Thank you. Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 21:38, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Helicopter Balloon (Mylar) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Helicopter Balloon (Mylar) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Helicopter Balloon (Mylar) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DAJF (talk) 00:05, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
KATMAKROFAN (talk) 00:17, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Too Denki


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Too Denki, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Siuenti (talk) 01:06, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Helicopter Balloon (Mylar)


A tag has been placed on Helicopter Balloon (Mylar), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 04:19, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dora V2.0


A tag has been placed on Dora V2.0 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SorryNotSorry ✽ ✉  08:37, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of NTC (fake version)


A tag has been placed on NTC (fake version) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  { MordeKyle }  &#9762; 00:56, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page. SorryNotSorry ✽ ✉  18:19, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Stop adding rubbish or face a block
You have been told and told and told that what you are adding is rubbish, and should not exist here. If you are uncertain why, then please use the teahouse to ask. — billinghurst  sDrewth  11:12, 26 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Then why you deleted this Kids Shoes. Open Source 2.0 check me 11:36, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Revolted. Why not? Discussion in article noticeboard incident and WP:AIV. Open Source 2.0 check me 11:36, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Telco Productions Inc. for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Telco Productions Inc. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Telco Productions Inc. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — billinghurst  sDrewth  11:31, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Other wiki's content
Another serious plans brewing to Open Source 2.0.

One of these are so unexpectedly rubbish. Many peoples getting upset due to elsewhere edit warring and copyrights. Many plans had been coincidentally unknown for this.

Here are some lists that copyright infringes you:

1. Do not copy this copyrighters.

2. Only owners should picture these via camera, phone or smartphone

3. Samples of these can copy through Upload.

4. Often too much of these will block from editing.

Unfortunately, it had been exists this Telco Productions Inc. event will be deleted and had GNG rated which had been decided.

Another one is Luxo Jr. who has been luckily patrolled to this one. Due to Reverted, it had been need some of information had been deleted. Which had been arguably perspective? Had any situations from WP:ITEXISTS.

In some cases, the Incident and Vandalism talk page will get some of these if any problems.

According to Fughetaboutit, the scenario of these gets sabotage of encyclopedia and will get reverted because of patroling is greatly appreciated.

If there is any attackers who vandalize this, tell your administrators of them.

Uncommonly, they had been coincidentally perspected this article.

Some inappropriate contents will be reverted from administrators.

If you had any troubles, see WP:YFA. Open Source 2.0 check me 21:56, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Continuation of Other wiki's content
I argued my user for her fault. My citation is greatly anger but at least there are many things I had been existed, I had created something else but I getting argue for some other reasons. But I think, lots of samples "Yintan frustrated about someone else fault. Then edit warring had been settled for sure." and there's more: and so on. Unfortunately, User talk:Lugnuts was our fault for blocking others. Open Source 2.0 check me 06:42, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
 * User talk:Ciaerwinrise254162
 * User talk:Swedenwish
 * User talk:Synthelabobabe21
 * User talk:FZKSleap frogpending
 * User talk:Gzkefpro
 * User talk:Saleh handicrafts
 * User talk:Daskjhon john
 * User talk:Ched anthony
 * User talk:Bizaardvarks (who had never edited yet).
 * User talk:Buford van Stomm
 * User talk:RFX Dealers
 * User talk:Lovexcaz
 * User talk:Perry OWCA
 * User talk:Leaderman2000
 * User talk:Shoemachatater

Speedy deletion nomination of Clash Of Clans (race car)


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Clash Of Clans (race car) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Telco Productions Inc. please declining AFD. Open Source 2.0 check me 02:50, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for creating nonsense pages. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 04:39, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Unblock or else indef block
Unblock!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OR ELSE SURRENDER!!!!!!!!!! Open Source 2.0 check me 04:59, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:19, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I've revoked talk page access, as I don't think they have any chance of getting unblocked and they're just posting more nonsense. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:20, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Another Block :-@
Again. Angrily. I had also blocked. Another catastrophe. I had decided to take over with User:Swedenwish so get lost. Accepted or blocked. 112.198.83.187 (talk) 14:21, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Please discuss on AIV and discussion. 112.198.83.187 (talk) 14:21, 14 February 2017 (UTC)