User talk:Openforbusiness

Quantum magick
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your, but for legal reasons, we CANNOT accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material.

As a consequence, your article will most likely be deleted; in fact, it may already have been deleted.

Feel free to re-submit a new version of the article. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text - which means allowing other people to modify it - then you have to prove that it's yours (because people can and do lie) by adding, on the external site, the statement that "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I irrevocably release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, for use on Wikipedia and elsewhere."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 17:28, 26 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The copyright is on the left hand side of the page. It's just below the "Quantum Mechanics And Psychokinesis" heading. Anyone can tag a copyright violation and any administrator can delete one. Have a check through Copyrights, even if other sites use it without saying where they got it Wikipedia can't. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 17:49, 26 October 2006 (UTC)


 * I have removed your comments from the Physics WIP talk page. I appreciate the suggestions, but one of the key points highlighted in the intro of the page is Discussion should generally be held within the boundaries of the current designated area - that designated area at the moment is the lead paragraph text - an area that paraphysics is unlikely to be mentioned in.


 * On a wider point your Paraphysics article may stand on slightly shaky ground. The "Journal of Paraphysics" is an aol page, and the article generally seems to consist of nothing but links - wikipedia is meant to inform the reader as well as direct them to other sources of information.  Regards, SFC9394 23:22, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

List of Occult Musicians
I've added the "prod" template to the article List of Occult Musicians, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:List of Occult Musicians. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Wafulz 05:11, 29 November 2006 (UTC)