User talk:Operarioribeiro

Suggestions for improving the article you started
Hello Operarioribeiro, and thank you for starting the article Interfaith studies. Here are a few suggestions for how it could be improved. In general, Wikipedia tries to maintain consistent styles for its articles, to make the articles easier to read. There's a general overview of this at Manual of Style. More specifically, here are a few things that can be improved at Interfaith studies:
 * External links: there are many inline external links in the article at the moment, and these are discouraged in articles, apart from a few special cases. Inline external links should be replaced with WP:Red links, to encourage other editors to create articles about notable subjects, or with a reference.
 * Manual of Style/Layout: it's better to use sections and sub-sections than to add a lot of boldface text to the article. There is a great deal of boldface and italic throughout the article, which can be jarring for some readers. It's best used sparingly: see MOS:BOLD.
 * Focus: much of the article is about relevant topics related to Interfaith studies, such as Interfaith studies. To maintain focus and readability, it's better to move lists like that, which aren't directly about interfaith studies, to related articles such as List of interreligious organizations. If no adequate article exists, then we can create one.
 * Neutral point of view: this is one of the WP:Five pillars of Wikipedia. I completely agree with you about the importance and urgent relevance of interfaith studies, but on Wikipedia we must always try not to assert our opinions in WP:WIKIVOICE. On the other hand, it's fine to quote someone notable in the field in an article, saying "Scholar X wrote in "Journal Y" that interfaith studies are of urgent relevance because...", with an appropriate reference for the quote.

I hope you find these suggestions useful. Happy editing! Wikishovel (talk) 09:19, 6 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much, Wikishovel.
 * MOSL: I was able to change the bold parts to subtitles.
 * NPOV: I tried to solve the NPOV issue as well, bringing the UNAOC UNOCT quote first. Please let me know what you think about it.
 * Focus: Due to the complete lack of understanding of the theme, I'd ask to please keep a short list of institutions and bibliography in the article itself (with a link to a larger article as you suggests), as I've seen in some articles.
 * External Links: Due to being really busy with urgent interfaith diplomacy works I won't be able to format the external links to references.
 * Can you, or someone else, please review what couldn't be fixed so that we may take the warnings out of the article?
 * PS: I created a "Needed Improvements" section in the article's talk, so if you want you may post this and further messages there to register our participation better. Operário Ribeiro (talk) 16:22, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Norman Rockwell&#39;s Golden Rule.webp listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Norman Rockwell&, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:28, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Interfaith studies moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Interfaith studies. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and 50% of the article is unsourced.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.  scope_creep Talk  18:18, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Interfaith Studies Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Interfaith Studies Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:17, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Interfaith studies (March 2)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Interfaith studies and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Interfaith_studies Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:S0091&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Interfaith_studies reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 15:52, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Interfaith studies (March 29)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Interfaith studies and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Interfaith_studies Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Interfaith_studies reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC)