User talk:Opertof

November 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Pioneer Courthouse Square has been reverted, as it appears to introduce incorrect information. Please do not intentionally add incorrect information to articles; use the sandbox for testing. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Faradayplank (talk) 22:18, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Pioneer Courthouse Square constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 22:19, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

A more personal message
Opertof, the issue at Pioneer Courthouse Square has been discussed extensively in the archives linked from the article's talk page. Please review that.

Regardless of whether or not you are a sock puppet of the previous editor, the position you're taking is something that goes against an overwhelming consensus. If you make the edit again without an attempt to discuss, I will block you from editing. -Pete (talk) 22:20, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Reply to talk page message
I no understanding. What I do wrong? Why you threat me to block? I help user that get bad treated. I keep do what I think right thing doing is. I no care if you threat me to block. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Opertof (talk • contribs) 22:23, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * A large number of editors have weighed in on this question, and the consensus is very clear. If you believe you have a point to make that has not been made before, bring it up on the article's talk page. But do not add the content to the article itself, due to the strong consensus expressed. -Pete (talk) 22:27, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Blocked
 Sandstein  22:42, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

You must understand how bad this looks. You showed up to edit the page three minutes after creating an account, and only a hour and a half after it was opened for editing. What sounds more likely, for a new user from Germany to register for the sole purpose of editing an article about a town square in Oregon to reinforce an opinion of a banned user, or that you are that user, and you made a new account when you saw that the protection ran out?

If you are a new user, however, answer this: how did you become interested in this article, and why do you think it needs the statements you laid out? Templarion (talk) 22:25, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

It no important what likely or not is likely. What important is I no relation to "sockpuppet." I interest in article because I travel to Oregon 5 year ago. I visit Pioneer Courthouse Square so have interest in Pioneer Courthouse Square. That first article I see on Wikipedia and I read that other editor treated bad! So I help! Then I ban even after I stop make edit! If I relate to "sockpuppet" then why I new user? You check where I from! Check IP address or something. I no relation to "sockpuppet". I new user from Germany. I no want to make abuse. I want back my account so I can edit again. I have no interest in disrupt.


 * Here's the problem with your claim: the only users treated badly were the ones who removed the content that you attempted to restore. The only users to have ever claimed that the person adding it was "other user treated badly" have been proven sockpuppets of that user.  That user has harassed and manipulated Wikipedia for over two years in an attempt to force his point of view into the article. He was not attempting to work things out in good faith; he blatantly lied and continued to attempt manipulation to get his way. Also, per community consensus, there's simply no compelling reason to add the content - as is blatantly obvious by reading the talk page archives.
 * As to your edits, you attempt to restore the content from the sockpuppet, you edit war identically to how the sockpuppet performed, you refer to the sockpuppet as "other user treated badly" which is identical to claims made by the sock in past edits when pretending to be a third party. Your actions to date are contrary to your claims. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 21:38, 27 November 2008 (UTC)