User talk:Ophion

Reality takes hold...I will almost certainly be unable to answer messages on this page.

Proposed deletion of Holy Name School
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Holy Name School, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Doesn't appear to meet criteria for notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Raven1977 (talk) 21:15, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Ophion! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:36, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Joanne Borgella -

Articles for deletion nomination of Theaters in Birmingham, MI
I have nominated Theaters in Birmingham, MI, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Theaters in Birmingham, MI. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Peppage tlk 13:06, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Theaters in Birmingham, MI
A tag has been placed on Theaters in Birmingham, MI requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:42, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Ardalambion listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ardalambion. Since you had some involvement with the Ardalambion redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 14:51, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Spamusement! for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spamusement! is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Spamusement! (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 15:04, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Olivier Wieviorka
Hello, Ophion. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Olivier Wieviorka, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Olivier Wieviorka to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 04:17, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Quantum theology2.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Quantum theology2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:59, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Beklan Empire


The article Beklan Empire has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NFICTION/WP:GNG/WP:PLOT"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 12:24, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Steven Frank (developer) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steven Frank (developer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Steven Frank (developer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Running 12:05, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Old Ben


The article Old Ben has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unsourced article. Found no significant coverage nor review of the subject to pass WP:NB."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 21:00, 25 October 2023 (UTC)